Financial Ombudsman Ditches Test After Lawmaker Criticism
Law360, London (November 20, 2018, 3:34 PM GMT) -- The Financial Ombudsman Service has ditched a test it wanted to use as it reviews its handling of old cases after lawmakers said the test was too stringent, correspondence published by a parliamentary website revealed Tuesday.
The FOS had originally intended to use the so-called Wednesbury test, which measures whether a decision is so irrational that no reasonable person would have reached it, as it reviews thousands of its rulings. But the Treasury Committee criticized the test as too tough and said using it would do little to restore public trust in the service.
Caroline Wayman, chief executive of the ombudsman service, said...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has redefined what it means to be the biggest of BigLaw — weighing in at 2,116 attorneys by year end 2018 and becoming the first firm since Law360 began tracking law firm head counts to top 2,000 U.S.-based attorneys.