By Nathaniel Castellano, Charles Blanchard and Dominique Casimir (September 18, 2018, 1:56 PM EDT) -- Palantir USG v. United States,[1] may prove to be one of the most significant procurement precedents of the decade. Affirming the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit breathed new life into the government's obligations under the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act to prioritize, to the maximum extent practicable, the acquisition of commercial and nondevelopmental solutions. Weaning agencies off their historic preference for developmental solutions is critical now more than ever, as it is readily apparent that maintaining the United States' technological and battlefield superiority depends on its ability to harness technologies from the commercial sector and become a more commercial-friendly business partner. The decision will have the practical impact of requiring agencies to more carefully document their market research. Palantir will also provide useful leverage for companies seeking to eliminate (whether by negotiation or protest) solicitation provisions that are not accommodating to commercial vendors....