The Quest For A 'Sound Basic Education' In North Carolina
By Abigail Harrison and Hayley Fowler
Robb Leandro was the original named plaintiff in one of the longest-running lawsuits in Tar Heel State history, centered on the state's constitutional obligation to provide children with a "sound basic education." Over three decades, a series of eponymous North Carolina Supreme Court opinions have steered the state toward what could be a multibillion-dollar remedy to improve public education. He's now waiting alongside millions of residents for the state's justices to release what could be a far-reaching opinion, more than two years after hearing oral argument.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
The Hypnosis That Helped Send A Man To Death Row
By Marco Poggio
The capital murder conviction of Charles Don Flores, a man on Texas’ death row, hinged on a courtroom identification by a witness who had previously undergone hypnosis. His lawyers are now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene, after Texas’ top court shot down his claims that the hypnosis session contaminated the witness’s memory and tainted her identification.
Petition attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
Roundup
Balancing The Scales: $3M Jury Verdict, GEO Appeal Denial
By Orlando Lorenzo
A Philadelphia federal judge rejected bids to disturb a $3 million jury award and impose sanctions on plaintiff's counsel arising from proceedings he described as "near-daily Festivus celebrations, where everyone got to air their grievances 'for the sake of the record'" and a Detroit man saw his murder conviction vacated after 27 years due to the case's reliance on a coerced confession and a lack of physical evidence, among other access to justice stories you may have missed.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LEGAL AID & PUBLIC DEFENSE
IMMIGRATION
NEWS
Ex-Cop, Examiner Fight Brothers' Wrongful Conviction Suit
By Melanie Dorsey
A Michigan federal judge heard arguments Wednesday regarding whether two brothers' lawsuit over their wrongful conviction for murder should head to a jury, with the plaintiffs and a former law enforcement officer and an ex-polygraph examiner debating if the decision to prosecute the brothers actually hinged on a witness's polygraph test that was later found to be erroneous.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|