|
TOP NEWS
Anti-SLAPP Law Doesn't Tank Firm Breakup Case, Judge Says
By Andrea Keckley
A Connecticut trial attorney and his new firm cannot invoke the state's anti-SLAPP law to dismiss claims brought by his former law partner, a state court judge held Thursday in one of multiple lawsuits stemming from Connecticut Trial Firm LLC's dissolution less than two years after it gained prominence with a record-setting personal injury verdict.
Decision attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Amazon Can't Push Back FTC Antitrust Trial
By Bryan Koenig
A Washington federal judge refused Friday to delay the Federal Trade Commission antitrust trial accusing Amazon.com Inc. of creating an artificial pricing floor in online retail, forcing the company to try to navigate a potential timing overlap in parallel state court litigation from the California attorney general.
Order attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPMENT
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL
INSURANCE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
EMPLOYMENT
Roundup
ERISA Recap: 6 Notable Decisions From September
By Kellie Mejdrich
The Tenth and Seventh circuits issued published opinions in two union retirement disputes, while the Sixth Circuit found that the Commonwealth of Kentucky's lawsuit against pharmacy benefit managers does not belong in state court, citing colorable federal preemption arguments. Here's more on those decisions and three other notable rulings involving the Employee Retirement Income Security Act that came down in September.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
DEALS LITIGATION
CANNABIS
LEGAL INDUSTRY
Pa. Firm Can't Toss Uber's RICO Claims Over Insurer Payouts
By Linda Chiem
A Pennsylvania federal judge allowed Uber to pursue Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims alleging a Philadelphia personal injury firm schemed with healthcare providers to fabricate medical records and inflate accident claims involving Uber and FedEx drivers, saying Uber doesn't lose standing just because its insurer paid its legal fees in underlying litigation.
Order attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|