|
TOP NEWS
Roblox To Pay $12.5M, Boost Child Safety In Deal With Nev.
By Allison Grande
Roblox has agreed to implement enhanced safeguards for children who use the popular interactive gaming platform and pay $12.5 million to fund an online safety awareness campaign and other initiatives as part of what Nevada's attorney general on Wednesday called a first-of-its-kind agreement to resolve claims that the company failed to adequately protect its youngest users.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Amazon Can't Nix MIT Economist Input On Antitrust Case
By Rachel Riley
A Seattle federal judge has shot down Amazon's bid to rule out a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor's opinions backing proposed class antitrust claims, finding the expert used a "peer reviewed economic model based on real-world transactional data" to conclude that Amazon's "anti-discounting policies" heightened prices in other online marketplaces.
Order attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Arbitration Assoc. Says Monopoly Suit Poses 'Massive Risks'
By Rae Ann Varona
The American Arbitration Association has urged an Arizona federal court to reconsider a ruling that allowed a monopoly suit against the association to proceed, saying that sustaining antitrust claims against the arbitration provider based on template arbitration clauses on its website poses "massive risks" for millions of customer arbitration contracts.
Memorandum attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
POLICY & REGULATION
ENFORCEMENT
LITIGATION
SURVEYS
EXPERT ANALYSIS
'Made In America' EO May Not Survive Section 230
President Donald Trump's recent executive order to combat fraudulent "Made in America" claims in advertising directs the Federal Trade Commission to deem online marketplaces' failure to verify third-party origin claims as unlawful, but such a rule would likely run into Section 230's publisher immunity doctrine, say attorneys at Blank Rome.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Fraud Enforcement, Sentencing Face Unusual Convergence
The Trump administration’s newly created task force to eliminate fraud and the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s recent proposals to scale back certain elements of the federal sentencing framework seem to point in opposite directions, creating a collision of policy priorities that may reshape how fraud cases are charged, negotiated and sentenced for years to come, says David Tarras at Tarras Defense.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LEGAL INDUSTRY
|