|
DISCRIMINATION
Nespresso Can't Ditch Most Bias Claims By Ex-Employee
By Celeste Bott
A former Nespresso employee has plausibly alleged that race was a motivating factor in decisions denying her promotions and pay raises that were instead granted to less-qualified white employees, an Illinois federal judge ruled Monday, denying most of the company's motion to dismiss while also tossing claims against individual defendants.
Order attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
WAGE & HOUR
LABOR
Machinists Seek Arbitration Over Contractor Firing
By Corey Rothauser
International Association of Machinists affiliates have asked a Florida federal judge to order an Air Force contractor to arbitrate a grievance over the firing of a union-represented employee, arguing the company is refusing to follow the dispute resolution process required by the parties' collective bargaining agreement.
Memorandum attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
BENEFITS
TRADE SECRETS
WRONGFUL TERMINATION
EXPERT ANALYSIS
How Justices' TPS Ruling Affects Workforce Planning
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent holding in Mullin v. Doe that courts lack jurisdiction to review temporary protected status determinations greenlights the end of TPS for thousands of Syrian and Haitian nationals, and means employers must reevaluate TPS-designees' employability while avoiding discriminatory document practices, says attorney Richard Herman.
Opinion attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LEGAL INDUSTRY
Analysis
Circuit-By-Circuit Guide To The US Supreme Court's Term
By Jeff Overley
Federal appeals courts had wide-ranging successes and struggles during the U.S. Supreme Court's recently completed term: One had its best showing in years following its worst showing in years; one felt déjà vu after recently starting to find favor with the justices; and one saw its reputation for independence occupy a rare role in the Supreme Court spotlight.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Polsinelli, Doctor Seek Toss Of 'Bad Faith' Patent Claims
By Elliot Weld
Polsinelli PC and a doctor who has been a client of the law firm have asked Mississippi and Tennessee federal courts to throw out Zavation Medical Products LLC and Choice Spine LLC's allegations that the firm and its client violated respective state laws by bringing "bad faith" patent infringement claims, saying the statutes the medical device makers rely on can't be brought by distributors or manufacturers.
2 documents attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|