|
TOP NEWS
ENFORCEMENT & COMPLIANCE
LITIGATION
Eating Disorder Pros Group Ducks Antitrust Suit For Good
By Bryan Koenig
An Illinois federal judge permanently dismissed a proposed antitrust class action Monday accusing the International Association of Eating Disorder Professionals of forcing specialists into expensive group memberships to obtain important certification, concluding the plaintiffs haven't shown that the organization has the needed market power.
Opinion attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
BANKRUPTCY
EXPERT ANALYSIS
Where The Justices Aligned In Appellate Authority Ruling
The real story of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp., finding that a doctrine designed to curtail duplicative litigation prevents federal district courts from reviewing state court decisions, is in how the justices together revisited an obscure, century-old jurisdictional doctrine, says Alex Dimitrief at Zeughauser Group.
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
Rare DOJ Military Bias Suit Shows Peril Of Co. Admissions
Although the government rarely litigates Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act claims against private employers, Opara v. UV Memory Care demonstrates that it will do so when an employer's own admissions build the case, potentially resulting in significant compliance obligations and long-term consequences, says Bradford Kelley at Littler.
2 documents attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
LEGAL INDUSTRY
1st Circ. Asked To Save Mayer Brown $21M Fee Bid In RI Suit
By Linda Chiem
The American Trucking Associations told the First Circuit that its attorneys at Mayer Brown LLP reasonably justified their request for $21 million in fees and costs after securing "substantial" wins in long-running litigation over Rhode Island's truck tolling program, disputing a district court's determination that the trucking trade group wasn't actually a "prevailing party."
Brief attached |
Read full article »
| Save to favorites »
|