Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Freedman Normand
-
Order | Filed: June 12, 2024 Mehedi et al v. View, Inc. f/k/a CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II et al
Securities/Commodities | California Northern
Order
ORDER GRANTING 203 MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT AND FOR RELIEF FROM A FINAL JUDGMENT, ORDER OR PROCEEDING AND VACATING 201 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/12/24. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2024)
-
Utility | Filed: June 12, 2024 | Entered: June 12, 2024 Williams et al v. Block.One et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Set/Reset Hearings
Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 7/9/2024 at 11:30 AM before Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 1:20-cv-03829-LAK(tg)
-
Order | Filed: June 12, 2024 Williams et al v. Block.One et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Order
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying (204) Motion for Reconsideration re (204 in 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 90 in 1:20-cv-03829-LAK) MOTION for Reconsideration re; (201 in 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 201 in 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 87 in 1:20-cv-03829-LAK, 87 in 1:20-cv-03 829-LAK) Order on Motion to Approve, Order on Motion for Attorney Fees,,,,,, . filed by Crypto Assets Opportunity Fund LLC in case 1:20-cv-02809-LAK; denying (90) Motion for Reconsideration re (204 in 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 90 in 1:20-cv-0 3829-LAK) MOTION for Reconsideration re; (201 in 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 201 in 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 87 in 1:20-cv-03829-LAK, 87 in 1:20-cv-03829-LAK) Order on Motion to Approve, Order on Motion for Attorney Fees,,,,,, . filed by Crypto A ssets Opportunity Fund LLC in case 1:20-cv-03829-LAK. The Court is in receipt of the parties' motions for reconsideration and renewed motions for class certification, approval of the class settlement, and approval of fees and expenses. Because the parties have filed renewed motions for certification and approval, their motions for reconsideration of the previously-denied motions requesting the same relief are unnecessary. Accordingly, the pending motions for reconsideration (20-cv-2809 Dkt 204; 20-cv-3829 Dkt 90) are denied. On Tuesday, July 9 at 11:30 A.M., the Court will hold a hearing on whether the Court should certify the proposed class in view of the very small number of claimants - especially given the much larger number of opt-outs - and if so, on the fairness of the proposed settlement. In the latter respect, the parties should be prepared to discuss: (1) all fees and expenses proposed; (2) the inclusion, proposed rates, and accrual dates of prejudgment interest to claimants; and (3) the appropriateness of redistributing excess settlement funds to the accepted claimants such that each claimant would be expected to receive a significant windfall over their recognized loss amounts. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 6/12/2024) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:20-cv-02809-LAK, 1:20-cv-03829-LAK (tg)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login