Mealey's Class Actions
-
June 03, 2025
Federal Judge Approves TCPA Class Settlement In Newspaper Subscription Suit
PHILADELPHIA — A Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) settlement that will provide class members with at least $800 each “is in excess of many class-action settlements in cases under the” TCPA, a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled, granting final approval of the $450,000 agreement between a telecommunications company and a certified class of individuals who received more than one newspaper subscription phone call in the last four years despite being on the National Do-Not-Call Registry (DNC).
-
June 03, 2025
Aerospace Engineering Firms’ Settlements Granted Final OK In No-Poaching Suit
NEW HAVEN, Conn. — A federal judge in Connecticut issued a pair of orders granting final approval of approximately $60.5 million in settlements reached in a class case by workers who accuse aerospace engineering firms and executives of conspiring to not solicit, recruit, hire without prior approval or otherwise compete for engineers and other skilled employees and awarding attorney fees, costs and service awards.
-
June 02, 2025
Prejudgment Interest Denied After Verdict In Tea Labeling Class Suit
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge in California denied a motion for prejudgment interest filed by a class of tea consumers after a jury returned a verdict in their favor in a case over the labeling on R.C. Bigelow’s tea products, finding that the length of litigation was not the fault of the defendant and rejected settlement offers were not “grounds to warrant prejudgment interest in this case.”
-
June 02, 2025
Judge Consolidates Class Discovery In Deceptive Marketing Zyn Suits
MIAMI — A Florida federal judge on May 30 granted an unopposed motion by the companies that manufacture and sell Zyn nicotine pouches to consolidate discovery in four pending putative class actions against them for allegedly deceptively marketing the products as nicotine cessation products.
-
June 02, 2025
U.S. High Court To Decide Appealability Of Order In Forced Labor Class Suit
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court this morning granted a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the operator of a private immigration detention facility in Colorado that asked the justices in a class suit by detainees alleging forced labor to decide whether interlocutory orders holding that a federal contractor does not meet the requirements under Yearsley v. W.A. Ross Construction Co. for a defense to liability for damages are immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.
-
May 30, 2025
9th Circuit Denies Rehearing After Student Loan Class Settlement Standing Ruling
SAN FRANCISCO — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denied a petition for rehearing en banc filed by a for-profit university after a split panel ruled that that school and two others failed to show that they had standing to challenge a final class settlement approval in a student loan dispute based on their inclusion in a settlement exhibit.
-
May 30, 2025
Ex-Employees’ Claims Over Duty-Free Shops’ Data Breach Partly Survive Dismissal
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. — Negligence and breach of implied contracts brought by two former employees against the operators of airport duty-free shops may proceed, a New York federal judge ruled, while dismissing unjust enrichment and fiduciary duty claims related to a 2023 data breach.
-
May 30, 2025
U.S. High Court Stays April Order In Class Suit Challenging Immigration Changes
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A divided U.S. Supreme Court on May 30 granted an application by the federal government and stayed an April order by a trial court in Massachusetts that granted temporary relief on a classwide basis in a case alleging that changes to immigration policies via President Donald J. Trump’s Jan. 20 executive orders (EOs) and a memorandum issued the same day by the acting secretary of Homeland Security have dismantled “legally established and Congressionally authorized pathways to the United States.”
-
May 30, 2025
Judgment Partly Granted To Meta, App Maker In Ovulation App Privacy Class Action
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge delivered a mixed summary judgment ruling to Meta Platforms Inc. and Flo Health Inc., as he partly dismissed privacy and consumer protection claims in a class action over allegations that users’ personally identifiable information (PII) was shared when they used the Flo Period & Ovulation Tracker app.
-
May 30, 2025
Nonprofits Whose Grants Were Canceled Sue DOJ, Seek Preliminary Injunction
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Five justice-related nonprofit organizations have filed a civil complaint against the U.S. Justice Department and related officials saying they violated the Administrative Procedure Act and constitutional guarantees of due process by canceling, without notice or explanation, more than 370 agreements and contracts with private organizations worth more than $820 million.
-
May 29, 2025
E-Cig Maker Accused Of Deceiving Vapers With ‘Greenwashing’ Claims
SAN FRANCISCO — Three e-cigarette users filed a putative class complaint on May 28 against R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (RJRV) and its affiliates, accusing them of violating California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws by misrepresenting their e-cigarette products to consumers as “carbon-neutral” to boost sales as part of an allegedly deceptive “greenwashing” campaign.
-
May 29, 2025
Ex-Employee’s Beef With Meatpacker’s Data Breach Response Sent To Arbitration
SAVANNAH, Ga. — Finding a beef producer’s arbitration agreement to be binding on a former employee that sued the company over a 2024 data breach, a Georgia federal judge directed the plaintiff to submit her putative negligence and breach of contract class claims to an arbitrator.
-
May 29, 2025
Final OK Given To $3.25 Million Settlement Of Class Action Over USAA Data Breach
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — An almost 4-year-old suit over a 2021 data breach experienced by United Services Automobile Association (USAA) was resolved when a New York federal judge approved a $3.25 million settlement between the insurance company and a lone lead plaintiff, disposing of claims including negligence and violation of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA).
-
May 28, 2025
$8.9M Settlement By Soda Company For ‘Prebiotic’ Claims Gets Preliminary OK
SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge granted an unopposed motion for preliminary approval of an $8.9 million settlement by the manufacturer of a soda product that was sued by consumers for violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) and other laws due to the product being deceptively labeled as “Prebiotic” and “gut healthy” and approved the plaintiffs’ plan to request a 30% attorney fee award.
-
May 28, 2025
Golden Corral, Employees Settle Data Breach Class Action For $1.85 Million
RALEIGH, N.C. — A $1.85 million settlement of class claims over a 2013 data breach experienced by Golden Corral Corp. received final approval from a North Carolina federal judge, who deemed the restaurant chain’s agreement with a class of employees whose personally identifiable information (PII) was compromised in the breach to be “fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interests of the” class.
-
May 28, 2025
High Court Gets More Feedback On Review Bid Concerning ERISA Benchmark Issue
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Retirement plan participants and an amicus curiae underwriter offer divergent views in briefing an Employee Retirement Income Security Act review petition, with the participants telling the U.S. Supreme Court that “participant-led ERISA fiduciary breach litigation has reduced by nearly 50% the expenses of retirement plan investments” and the underwriter contending that “lower courts’ failure to strike the right balance in fiduciary breach cases has been hugely disruptive and wasteful.”
-
May 28, 2025
Another ERISA Case Over A Health Plan Tobacco Surcharge Survives Dismissal
RICHMOND, Va. — Calling Mehlberg v. Compass Grp. USA, Inc. “analogous and compelling persuasive authority,” a Virginia federal judge declined to dismiss a putative class action that is part of a recent wave of similar Employee Retirement Income Security Act suits over health plan tobacco surcharges.
-
May 27, 2025
U.S. High Court Won’t Review Summary Judgment Reversal In Parking Fine Class Suit
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 27 denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by Los Angeles after a split Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel reversed summary judgment for the city in a putative class complaint challenging the city’s parking fee and late payment penalty.
-
May 27, 2025
2nd Circuit Finds It Has No Jurisdiction To Review State Labor Class Judgment
NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal of a judgment on state law wage and hour class claims because the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ unadjudicated Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claims to allow for intermediate appeal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) was conditional.
-
May 23, 2025
9th Circuit Agrees That Lack Of ‘Meaningful Benchmarks’ Dooms ERISA Funds Case
HONOLULU — Saying that retirement plan participants “did not plausibly allege that [Intel Corp.]’s funds underperformed other funds with comparable aims,” the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 22 affirmed dismissal of a putative class Employee Retirement Income Security Act suit challenging retirement plan investments in hedge funds and private equity; the ruling was accompanied by a nine-page concurring opinion that aimed “to clarify the role of comparisons and circumstantial allegations in duty-of-prudence claims.”
-
May 23, 2025
Recommendation For Individual Arbitration Flagged In Effective Vindication Row
ATLANTA — A recent report and recommendation from a Florida federal court has been flagged as a supplemental authority in an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals challenge to use of the effective vindication doctrine in a putative class action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act; the appeal has drawn amicus curiae input from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and an advocacy organization.
-
May 22, 2025
Class Mostly Certified In Privacy Suit Alleging Tracking By Ovulation App
SAN FRANCISCO — A group of women in a consolidated suit alleging privacy violations by the creator of the Flo Period & Ovulation Tracker app saw their motion for class certification mostly granted by a California federal judge who found that the plaintiffs satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 “with a few specific, claim-related exceptions.”
-
May 21, 2025
23andMe Reports Bankruptcy Asset Sale, Suggests Global Settlement Of Privacy Suit
SAN FRANCISCO — Two months after a consolidated privacy suit over a breach of 23andMe Inc.’s network was stayed for bankruptcy proceedings, the financially troubled DNA testing company informed a California federal court in a May 20 joint case management statement that “substantially all” of its assets had been purchased in a three-day auction pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.
-
May 20, 2025
$6 Million Settlement Of Class Suit Over Union’s Data Breach Gets Final Approval
NEW YORK — Two union members were granted final approval of class negligence and breach of contract claims against a labor union over a 2023 data breach, with a New York federal judge deeming the $6 million settlement to be preferable to the expenses and “uncertainties of continued litigation.”
-
May 20, 2025
Pension Fund Seeks Rehearing En Banc Of Securities Case Against Gaming Company
PASADENA, Calif. — A pension fund filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, arguing that a panel was wrong to affirm the dismissal of its class action suit alleging that a gaming company it invested in falsely inflated its share prices by finding that it needed to plead loss causation as part of its stock scheme claims.