WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court in a June 30 orders list invited the U.S. solicitor general to provide the federal government’s perspective on a petition to review a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 2-1 revival of a putative class action over a passively managed Northern Trust Focus Funds suite of target date funds (TDFs); the decision concerns the role benchmarks play in pleading Employee Retirement Income Security Act claims.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In an order list, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 30 granted a petition for review of a Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act (MPPAA) withdrawal liability decision that the federal government filed an amicus curiae brief urging it to grant — but did not reformulate the question presented as the government suggested.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As the federal government urged in a requested amicus curiae brief, the U.S. Supreme Court in a June 30 order list declined to review a ruling that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and Medicare Part D partially preempt an Oklahoma pharmaceutical benefit manager (PBM) law.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Labor unions and nonprofits challenging U.S. Digital Service and U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization (together, DOGE) personnel’s right to access U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) records failed to show imminent misuse or public disclosure, a federal judge in the District of Columbia ruled June 27, denying the unions and nonprofits’ request for a preliminary injunction.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 in a 6-3 ruling held that a Texas law requiring the operators of pornographic websites to verify that their visitors are adults does not violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a 6-3 reversal concerning the structure of a task force that issues preventive care recommendations, the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 ruled that “members are inferior officers whose appointment by the Secretary of HHS [the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] is permissible under the Appointments Clause” of the U.S. Constitution.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on June 27 ruled 6-3 that a Federal Communications Commission subsidy program does not violate the doctrines of nondelegation or  “private nondelegation,” finding that the FCC’s delegations were properly guided by an “intelligible principle” set forth by Congress and reversing the en banc Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Nationwide or universal injunctions “likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts,” a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 27, partially staying nationwide injunctions issued in three cases challenging President Donald J. Trump’s Jan. 20 birthright citizenship executive order (EO),