Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes
- 
									November 03, 2025
									
Hawaii Appeals Court Vacates Ruling In Insurer’s Favor In COVID-19 Coverage Suit
HONOLULU — The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals determined that a restaurant and bar owner insured established that there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether its business interruption was “caused by direct physical loss of or damage to property” at its insured premises and that its commercial insurer did not establish that any policy exclusion barred coverage, vacating a lower court’s judgment in favor of the insurer and remanding for further proceedings.
 - 
									October 30, 2025
									
2nd Circuit Affirms That Insurrection Triggered CITGO Marine Reinsurance Coverage
NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed a lower court ruling that granted a $54.2 million judgment to CITGO Petroleum Corp., holding that the 2020 seizure of crude oil at a Venezuelan port arose from an “insurrection” as defined in its marine cargo reinsurance contract and that losses from the seizure were accordingly covered under the contract’s war risk provisions.
 - 
									October 30, 2025
									
Delaware Court Tosses Excess Insurers’ Suit Disputing Coverage For Opioid Suits
WILIMNGTON, Del. — A Delaware court granted a management consulting firm insured’s motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by its excess commercial general liability insurers seeking a declaration that they have no duty to defend and indemnify against more than 260 underlying lawsuits seeking to hold the insured accountable for contributing to and profiting from the opioid epidemic.
 - 
									October 29, 2025
									
N.C. Judge Refuses To Dismiss $50M Coverage Suit Arising From Coronavirus
GREENSBORO, N.C. — A North Carolina judge denied primary and excess insurers’ motion to dismiss a limited partnership that owns and operates shopping centers containing outlet stores’ breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for its alleged “tens of millions of dollars in losses” caused by the coronavirus pandemic, holding that North Carolina law applies to the interpretation of the insurance policies at issue and discovery is necessary to determine the insured’s applicable date of loss.
 - 
									October 28, 2025
									
Justin Baldoni, Movie Studios Move To Toss Insurer’s Suit In Favor Of Other Forum
NEW YORK — Justin Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios LLC, It Ends With Us Movie LLC and its movie studio officers have asked a New York federal court to dismiss or stay their management liability insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to provide coverage for Blake Lively’s sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation action, arguing that it is “sufficiently more efficient” for the insurer to join a related lawsuit that they filed in a California state court against three of their other insurers.
 - 
									October 28, 2025
									
Insurer, City Seek Dismissal Of Coverage Suit Arising From Wrongful Conviction
DURHAM, N.C. — Following a settlement of all claims, a commercial general liability insurer and the city of Concord, N.C., filed a joint stipulation on Oct. 27 asking the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina to dismiss with prejudice the city’s breach of contract and declaratory judgment lawsuit alleging that the insurer has a duty to defend, indemnify and contribute to a $9.3 million settlement of an underlying wrongful conviction lawsuit.
 - 
									October 28, 2025
									
Insurer Is Equitably Estopped From Denying Coverage, 2nd Circuit Affirms
NEW YORK — The Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals concluded that a supermarket owner’s insurer is equitably estopped from disclaiming coverage for an underlying personal injury lawsuit that was brought against the owner of the property where the supermarket’s employee was injured when he fell down an elevator shaft, affirming the lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of the property owner’s insurer on its equitable estoppel claim.
 - 
									October 28, 2025
									
Majority: Misappropriation Exclusion Does Not Relieve Insurer Of Its Duty To Defend
NEW YORK — A Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals majority vacated a lower federal court’s dismissal of a law firm insured’s defense and indemnification claims against its professional liability insurer, reversed its denial of the insured’s motion for partial summary judgment as to the insurer’s duty to defend and remanded for the lower court to enter partial summary judgment in favor of the insured, finding that the insurer cannot defeat its duty to defend based on the policy’s misappropriation exclusion.
 - 
									October 24, 2025
									
NRA Seeks High Court Review Of Reversal In Free Speech Suit Over Insurance Program
NEW YORK — The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals holding that a former superintendent of the New York department that regulates insurance is entitled to qualified immunity on the NRA’s First Amendment coercion and retaliation claims against New York state officials and the department, challenging the panel’s reversal of a lower federal court’s order denying the former superintendent and the department’s motion to dismiss the NRA’s suit alleging that she unconstitutionally threatened or coerced an insurer or other entities to stifle its speech.
 - 
									October 23, 2025
									
Court ‘Diligently Handled’ Jurisdictional Remand In Suit Against Contractor, Surety
BOSTON— The First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals remanded a lawsuit seeking to recover subcontractors’ financial losses after a contractor and its surety allegedly did not pay them for work related to rebuilding projects in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands following Hurricane Maria, instructing the lower federal court to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
 - 
									October 22, 2025
									
Louisiana High Court Won’t Review Asbestos Liability Row With Guaranty Association
NEW ORLEANS — The Louisiana Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association (LIGA) seeking review of an appellate court’s reversal of a ruling granting summary judgment to an insurer and to LIGA but denying a motion for partial summary judgment filed by family members in a dispute over their deceased relative’s death purportedly from asbestos exposure.
 - 
									October 21, 2025
									
5th Circuit Partly Reverses Ruling In CGL Insurer’s Favor In Well Operator’s Suit
NEW ORLEANS — The Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 20 reversed a lower federal court’s dismissal of a well operator’s claims that a commercial general liability insurer has a duty to defend and indemnify its oilfield services company insured against an underlying dispute arising from well damage, finding that the insurer waived the policy’s consent-to-suit requirement and that the fact that the assignee could not recover from the insured or its bankruptcy assets does not preclude its duty to indemnify claim against the insurer.
 - 
									October 21, 2025
									
BlueCross, Excess E&O Insurer Stipulate To Dismiss Bad Faith, Breach Of Contract Suit
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Capital BlueCross and its excess errors and omissions insurer filed a stipulation in a Pennsylvania federal court seeking dismissal with prejudice of Capital BlueCross’ breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit arising from an underlying antitrust multidistrict litigation.
 - 
									October 20, 2025
									
Chemical Company Says Settlement Reached In Coverage Suit Arising From Explosion
BEAUMONT, Texas — A sustainable chemical company insured filed a notice in a Texas federal court indicating that it has reached a settlement with its insurer of its breach of contract and declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking to obtain coverage for the full value of its business interruption loss caused by an explosion at a Texas plant.
 - 
									October 17, 2025
									
No Coverage Owed For BIPA Class Action Against Insured, Illinois Panel Affirms
CHICAGO — An Illinois appeals panel concluded that an insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify its information technology services and consulting firm insured against an underlying putative class lawsuit brought under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), affirming the lower court’s finding that the insured’s “wrongful acts” and “enterprise security events” were not covered because they occurred prior to the policy's retroactive date.
 - 
									October 17, 2025
									
2 Named Plaintiffs Have Standing To Pursue Claims Stemming From Data Breach
RICHMOND, Va. — Two of four named plaintiffs in a consolidated class action stemming from a data breach incident have standing to pursue their claims against the insurance companies whose network was hacked because their allegation that their driver's license numbers were posted on the dark web after the breach constitutes a concrete injury, the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said in partially reversing a district court’s opinion dismissing the case.
 - 
									October 15, 2025
									
Judge Dismisses Defective Wine Coverage Dispute After Winemaker, Insurer Settle
SEATTLE — The same day a commercial winemaker and an excess commercial general liability insurer filed a notice of settlement, a federal judge in Washington dismissed the coverage dispute arising from an underlying faulty vinification lawsuit over allegedly defective wine.
 - 
									October 15, 2025
									
Judge Dismisses Coverage Dispute Over Claims Insured Falsely Markets Milk Product
CHICAGO — Four days after an insurer filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, a federal judge in Illinois on Oct. 14 dismissed without prejudice the insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Fairlife LLC against an underlying putative class action alleging that it markets its milk products through false or misleading statements.
 - 
									October 15, 2025
									
Panel: Insurer Of Wendy’s Franchise Owes No Coverage For Assault And Battery Claims
LAS VEGAS — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a Wendy’s franchise owner’s insurer has no duty to indemnify Wendy’s employees against an underlying assault and battery lawsuit, agreeing with the lower federal court that there was no “occurrence” to trigger policy coverage because the underlying claims are intentional torts.
 - 
									October 14, 2025
									
Insurer Dismisses Coverage Dispute Over Claims Insured Falsely Markets Milk Product
CHICAGO — An insurer voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit asking an Illinois federal court to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Fairlife LLC against an underlying putative class action alleging that it markets its milk products through false or misleading statements.
 - 
									October 13, 2025
									
Panel: Conflict Of Interest Claims Do Not Fall Under Misappropriation Exclusion
ATLANTA — An 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Oct. 10 affirmed a lower federal court’s dismissal of a professional liability insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify an attorney and law firm for an underlying legal malpractice lawsuit, finding that the underlying conflict of interest claims do not fall under the policy’s misappropriation exclusion and, therefore, the insurer must defend the entire underlying action.
 - 
									October 13, 2025
									
Insurer Appeals Dismissal Of Suit Disputing Coverage For Sexual Assault Claims
DENVER — A commercial general liability insurer notified a Colorado federal court on Oct. 10 that it is appealing the court’s dismissal of its lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) for a Paralympic swimmer’s lawsuit alleging that a team member sexually assaulted and harassed him and that USOPC failed to warn his parents about the team member or to supervise the accused, challenging the court’s finding that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
 - 
									October 10, 2025
									
Judge Denies Embryo Storage Lab’s Motion To Stay Consumer Fraud Coverage Dispute
CHICAGO — A federal judge in Illinois denied an embryo storage lab’s motion to stay its professional liability insurer’s lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the lab for an underlying class action alleging the insured engaged in false and deceptive advertising and failed to fully disclose the accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing, ruling that the doctrine in Md. Cas. Co. v. Peppers does not require staying the action.
 - 
									October 10, 2025
									
Insurer Disputes Coverage For Suit Alleging Insured Falsely Markets Milk Products
CHICAGO — An insurer filed suit in a federal court in Illinois seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Fairlife LLC against an underlying putative class action alleging that it markets its milk products through false or misleading statements, arguing that the runoff exclusion bars coverage.
 - 
									October 10, 2025
									
Group Home Appeals No Coverage Ruling For Underlying Negligence Suit
DULUTH, Minn. — The operators of a group home notified a Montana federal court that it is appealing the court’s holding that a commercial general liability insurer has no duty to defend them against an underlying negligence lawsuit and that they are not entitled to attorney fees, challenging the court’s ruling that no coverage was triggered because the underlying complaint alleges only mental injuries and not bodily injury, sickness or disease.