Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes

  • June 04, 2025

    Insured’s Negligence Complaint Against Broker Is Untimely, Indiana Panel Affirms

    INDIANAPOLIS — An Indiana appeals panel affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurance broker in an insured’s lawsuit alleging that the broker negligently failed to provide advice on how to procure event cancellation insurance after the insured discovered that its insurance policies did not cover its business losses arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, concluding that there are no material questions of fact regarding whether Indiana’s two-year statute of limitations period expired before the insured filed its complaint.

  • June 04, 2025

    Justice: Insurer Has Duty To Defend Additional Insured Against Personal Injury Suit

    NEW YORK — A New York justice declared that an insurer has a duty to defend a plaintiff contractor against an underlying personal injury lawsuit as an additional insured and ordered the insurer to reimburse the plaintiff all attorney fees and costs that it incurred in the underlying action.

  • June 03, 2025

    Car Wash’s Breach Of Contract Suit Against Insurer Is Untimely, 9th Circuit Affirms

    PASADENA, Calif. — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of a businessowners insurer in a car wash operator insured’s breach of contract and bad faith lawsuit seeking coverage for two theft claims, agreeing with the lower court that the lawsuit was untimely as a matter of law.

  • June 02, 2025

    Judge Grants Insurer’s Motion To Dismiss Retailer’s Suit Arising From Coronavirus

    CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — A federal judge in Tennessee granted an insurer’s motion to dismiss a women’s fashion retailer’s breach of contract and declaratory judgment lawsuit seeking business interruption coverage for its losses arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that the policy terms unambiguously state that the policy does not cover losses resulting directly or indirectly from viruses pursuant to Tennessee law.

  • May 30, 2025

    Judge Grants Dismissal Motion In Coverage Row Related To Social Media Addiction MDL

    OAKLAND, Calif. — A California federal judge granted insurers’ motion to dismiss a breach of contract suit filed against them by Meta Platforms Inc. and Instagram LLC over the insurers’ purported duty to defend and indemnify the insureds in a product liability multidistrict ligation regarding the alleged addictive qualities for adolescents of several of the largest social media platforms, finding that dismissal in favor of a suit in Delaware is appropriate under the first-to-file rule.

  • May 30, 2025

    Judge Grants Excess D&O Insurer’s Motion To Dismiss 4 Claims In Law Firm’s Suit

    MIAMI — A federal chief judge in Florida granted an excess directors and officers liability insurer’s motion to dismiss four claims in a law firm’s lawsuit seeking payment for the legal representation of its insured, giving the insurer until June 9 to file an answer to the complaint’s remaining four claims.

  • May 29, 2025

    Roofing Contractor Appeals Coverage Ruling For Insurer To 7th Circuit

    CHICAGO — A roofing contractor on May 28 notified an Illinois federal court that it is appealing the court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to its insurer in the insurer’s suit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the contractor in an underlying lawsuit alleging that the insured’s negligent repair work contributed to the collapse of a building façade, killing two people.

  • May 29, 2025

    Bump-Up Exclusion Bars D&O Coverage For $90M Settlement Over Merger, Panel Affirms

    RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 28 affirmed a lower federal court’s holding that a “bump-up” exclusion unambiguously precludes directors and officers liability insurance coverage for the $90 million settlement of two underlying lawsuits arising from a 2015 merger including $17,626,730 of the total settlement that ultimately went toward attorney fees.

  • May 29, 2025

    Magistrate Judge Allows CGL Insurer To Intervene In Ghost Guns Coverage Dispute

    NEW YORK — A New York federal magistrate judge granted a commercial general liability insurer’s motion to intervene in another insurer’s declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for underlying claims that their mutual insured violated federal, state and local laws when it deliberately sold and shipped ghost gun parts and kits to New York, concluding that permissive intervention is warranted “to facilitate the efficient resolution of disputes involving a common question of law or fact in one proceeding.”

  • May 29, 2025

    Final OK Given To $3.25 Million Settlement Of Class Action Over USAA Data Breach

    WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — An almost 4-year-old suit over a 2021 data breach experienced by United Services Automobile Association (USAA) was resolved when a New York federal judge approved a $3.25 million settlement between the insurance company and a lone lead plaintiff, disposing of claims including negligence and violation of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA).

  • May 28, 2025

    Majority Reverses Punitive Damages Ruling In Suit Arising From Hurricane Florence

    RALEIGH, N.C. — A majority of the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an appeals court majority’s holding that an insured’s allegations are sufficient to state a claim for negligence against an insurance agent in a lawsuit arising from Hurricane Florence property damage but  reversed its ruling as to the punitive damages claim.

  • May 28, 2025

    10th Circuit Finds Date Of Plumbing Plan Unclear, Reverses Judgment For Engineer

    DENVER — In the wake of the Wyoming Supreme Court’s ruling that the two-year statute of limitations for professional negligence claims attaches to the design that was the legal cause of the purported injury, the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 27 ruled that a trial court erred in finding a subrogated homeowners insurer’s claim against a mechanical engineering firm that designed a home’s plumbing time-barred, noting that the record does not include the date of the plans the plumber used to install the faulty plumbing.

  • May 28, 2025

    Winemaker Seeks To Exclude Insurer’s Expert Witness In Dispute Over Defective Wine

    SEATTLE — A commercial winemaker moved to exclude the rebuttal testimony and report of an excess commercial general liability insurer’s expert witness in a coverage dispute arising from an underlying faulty vinification lawsuit over allegedly defective wine, arguing in a Washington federal court that the insurer’s expert’s testimony and report are properly excluded under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c)(1).

  • May 28, 2025

    7th Circuit Refuses To Reconsider Ruling In Coverage Dispute Over BIPA Violations

    CHICAGO —The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals declined a commercial liability insurer’s invitation to reconsider its opinion that vacated and remanded a lower court’s ruling in favor of the insurer in its lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying putative class action alleging that a food ingredient manufacturer insured violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).

  • May 28, 2025

    Doctor Appeals No Coverage Ruling In Suit Arising From Alleged Hidden Cameras

    NEW YORK — A doctor insured filed a notice of appeal asking the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to review a lower federal court’s dismissal of her breach of contract lawsuit seeking business interruption and umbrella coverage for her losses arising from discovery of hidden cameras at her dermatology office.

  • May 27, 2025

    U.S. High Court Refuses To Review Dismissal Of Insurer’s Claims Against Law Firm

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 27 denied a professional liability insurer’s petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of a Montana Supreme Court’s ruling that affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of its third-party complaint alleging legal malpractice against a now bankrupt law firm and two attorneys who represented its insured in an underlying class action, leaving undisturbed the Montana Supreme Court’s holding that the insurer failed to establish the existence of personal jurisdiction over the attorneys and firm.

  • May 23, 2025

    Insurer Disputes Coverage For Suit Arising From Super Bowl Parade Shooting

    KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A commercial general liability insurer filed a first amended complaint in a Missouri federal court seeking a declaration that it has no duty to provide coverage for an underlying lawsuit alleging The Greater Kansas City Sports Commission did not implement adequate security measures to protect the thousands of attendees at the 2024 Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl victory parade, asserting that the policy’s assault and battery exclusion bars coverage.

  • May 22, 2025

    Contamination Exclusion Bars Coverage For COVID-19 Losses, Texas Panel Says

    AUSTIN, Texas — A contamination exclusion bars coverage for an insured’s claim seeking coverage for damages and losses incurred as a result of the coronavirus because the exclusion is not ambiguous and clearly includes viruses in its definition of contamination, the Third District Texas Court of Appeals said May 22 in affirming a trial court’s judgment in favor of the insurers.

  • May 21, 2025

    Insurer Challenges 7th Circuit Ruling In Coverage Dispute Over BIPA Violations

    CHICAGO — A commercial liability seeks rehearing of the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling that vacated and remanded a lower court’s ruling in its favor in its lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying putative class action alleging that a food ingredient manufacturer insured violated the Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), asking the appeals court to amend and correct its opinion to omit any reference to an underlying settlement and omit its conclusion that the insurer will have a duty to indemnify under a 2015 insurance policy if the insured’s notice of the underlying claim was timely.

  • May 21, 2025

    Insured’s Assignee Brings Bad Faith Suit Seeking To Recover $3.2M Consent Judgment

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A horse stable owner insured’s assignee sued an insurer for bad faith in a Florida federal court, seeking to recover an underlying $3.2 million consent judgment arising from the settlement of an underlying fraud lawsuit.

  • May 21, 2025

    Majority’s Opinion Rewrites Bad Faith Law In Florida, Insurer Argues To 11th Circuit

    ATLANTA — An insurer filed a petition seeking rehearing of an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals majority’s reversal of a lower federal court’s grant of summary judgment in its favor in an insured’s lawsuit alleging that it acted in bad faith when it failed to make a settlement offer in an estate’s allegations of negligent security against the insured, contending that the “majority’s opinion rewrites Florida bad faith law.”

  • May 21, 2025

    Clinic Insured, Assignee Appeal Ruling In Favor Of Professional Liability Insurer

    SALT LAKE CITY — A clinic insured and its assignee filed a notice indicating they are appealing a Utah federal judge’s ruling that granted a professional liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment on the remaining bad faith claim in a coverage dispute arising from a medical malpractice lawsuit.

  • May 20, 2025

    U.S. High Court Refuses To Review Insurers’ Petition In Tribal Jurisdiction Dispute

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 19 denied insurers’ petition for a writ of certiorari asking it to determine “whether a tribal court can exercise jurisdiction over nonmembers of the tribe based on off-reservation conduct,” leaving undisturbed a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ opinion that affirmed a federal court’s finding that a tribal court has subject matter jurisdiction over a COVID-19 coverage suit involving tribal properties on tribal land.

  • May 20, 2025

    Supreme Court Rejects Insurer’s Challenge To Ruling In Favor Of Tribal Court Judges

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on May 19 declined an insurer’s invitation to review a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ holding that a tribal court has subject matter jurisdiction over it in a dispute over the tribe’s claims for business interruption losses at its casino caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, refusing to review the appeals court’s ruling that affirmed a lower federal court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of two tribal court judges on the alternative ground that the insurance policy at issue satisfies Montana v. United States’ consensual-relationship exception.

  • May 20, 2025

    Judge Rules On Cross-Motions For Summary Judgment In Painter Injury Coverage Suit

    HARTFORD, Conn. — A Connecticut judge granted in part and denied in part an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify against underlying claims arising from a painter’s injury and denied one of the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, finding that the cross liability exclusion bars coverage for some of the claims.