Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes
-
August 06, 2025
Magistrate Stays CGL Coverage Dispute Over Negligence Claims Against Mutual Insured
FRESNO, Calif. — A federal magistrate judge in California granted plaintiff and defendant commercial general liability insurers’ request to stay proceedings in a coverage dispute over underlying allegations that their mutual insured negligently conducted cyclic steaming operations to extract and harvest oil.
-
August 05, 2025
Professional Liability Insurer: No Coverage Owed For RICO Suit Against Law Firms
LOS ANGELES — A lawyers’ professional liability insurer filed suit in a federal court in California, seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its law firm insureds against an underlying Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit brought by Ford Motor Co., arguing that the underlying action fails to allege an act or omission in the insureds’ performance of legal services.
-
August 05, 2025
Financial Services Company Sues Primary, Excess D&O Insurers In Delaware Court
WILMINGTON, Del. — A financial services company insured sued its primary and excess insurers in a Delaware court, seeking directors and officers insurance coverage for its defense costs associated with an underlying arbitration arising from claims that the insured recruited a broker-dealer’s employees to steal trade secret software code and proprietary information that they used to build competing products and businesses.
-
August 05, 2025
Pollution Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage For EtO Claims, Insured Says
PHILADELPHIA — A pollution exclusion does not bar coverage for underlying claims stemming from the contamination of ice cream with ethylene oxide (EtO) because the excess insurer’s policy states that the pollution exclusion will not apply if a loss is covered by the policy underlying the excess insurer’s policy, an insured says in a complaint filed in Pennsylvania court.
-
August 04, 2025
Majority: Restitutionary Award Not Insurable Under California Law
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals majority on Aug. 4 affirmed a lower federal court’s grant of a business and management indemnity insurer’s motion to dismiss a venture capital firm’s breach of contract lawsuit, agreeing with the lower court that a restitutionary award made by arbitrators is not insurable under California law.
-
August 04, 2025
Professional Liability Insurer Announces Judgment Satisfied In Mold Coverage Dispute
LAS VEGAS — A contractor’s professional and indemnity liability insurer filed a notice in a federal court in Nevada indicating that a broker’s professional liability insurer has satisfied a judgment in its favor in a coverage dispute arising from mold and moisture-related damage.
-
August 04, 2025
Absolute Firearms Exclusion Bars Coverage For Negligence Suit Over Fatal Shooting
GREAT FALLS, Mont. — A federal judge in Montana granted a liquor liability insurer’s motion for summary judgment in its declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for an underlying negligence action arising from a fatal shooting at the insured’s bar, concluding that the policy’s Absolute Firearms Exclusion bars coverage.
-
August 01, 2025
4th Circuit Vacates, Remands Suit Against Insurer Arising From Tree Damage
RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 31 vacated and remanded a lower federal court’s ruling that granted an insurer’s motion to dismiss an insured’s lawsuit arising from tree damage, finding that the lower court failed to parse the claims alleged solely against the insurer and to determine whether those claims were valid.
-
August 01, 2025
Florida Panel Reverses Ruling In Broker’s Favor In Hurricane Michael Coverage Suit
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A Florida appeals panel reversed a lower court’s summary judgment ruling in favor of an insurance broker in a lawsuit arising from damage to a recreational vehicle (RV) park caused by Hurricane Michael, remanding for further proceedings and declining to address the lower court’s order denying the broker’s motion for attorney fees.
-
July 30, 2025
Judge Dismisses Master Complaint Against Insurer In Coronavirus Coverage MDL
CHICAGO — The federal judge in Illinois who is overseeing a multidistrict litigation by hospitality industry insureds who sought business interruption protection coverage for their losses arising from the coronavirus pandemic on July 30 granted an insurer’s renewed motion to dismiss a master complaint, finding that decisions in other cases interpreting similar and mostly identical coverage provisions “almost uniformly held that there must be some physical effect or alteration to the insured property, not just a loss of its use.”
-
July 30, 2025
11th Circuit Reverses In Suit Seeking Policy Rescission Over Misrepresentations
ATLANTA — The 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on July 29 reversed and remanded a district court order dismissing a general liability insurer’s suit seeking a policy rescission for purported material misrepresentations in a policy renewal application and a declaration that it does not have a duty to defend or indemnify an underlying negligence action related to a parasailing accident, finding that the lower court’s dismissal of the duty to defend claim was an abuse of discretion and that the district court should exercise jurisdiction regarding the rescission claim.
-
July 30, 2025
Judge Dismisses Professional Negligence Suit Over Water Damage Following Settlement
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — A federal judge in Wyoming on July 29 granted a homeowners insurer, mechanical engineering firm and plumbing company’s stipulated motion to dismiss with prejudice the subrogated insurer’s negligence suit arising from water damage that was allegedly caused by improperly installed plumbing.
-
July 30, 2025
Illinois Majority: Cyber Event Exclusion Bars Coverage For Fraudulent Wire Transfer
CHICAGO — An Illinois appeals court majority affirmed a lower court’s ruling in favor of an insurer in its declaratory judgment lawsuit disputing coverage for the insureds’ underlying $673,384.18 loss arising from a fraudulent wire transfer, holding that the policy’s cyber event exclusion bars coverage.
-
July 30, 2025
Judge: Insurers Have Duty To Defend, Indemnify Hotel Against Sex Trafficking Suit
NORFOLK, Va. — A federal judge in Virginia granted an insured’s motion to dismiss its insurers’ lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that they have no duty to defend or indemnify against a Jane Doe’s claims that she was trafficked for sex at a hotel that was owned or operated by the insured, ruling that the policy unambiguously covers the conduct alleged in the underlying action.
-
July 28, 2025
4th Circuit Affirms Ruling In Dispute Over Lender’s Insurance Premiums
RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held that a mortgage lender did not violate the Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions (CLEC) by retaining a portion of the appellant’s insurance premiums as a commission, affirming a lower federal court’s ruling that granted the lender’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
-
July 28, 2025
U.S. Tax Court Clarifies, Maintains Ruling In Favor Of IRS In Microcaptive Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Stating that “the Court failed to fully clarify two important issues” in a March opinion, a U.S. Tax Court judge issued a supplemental memorandum opinion in a consolidated case maintaining that a purported captive insurance arrangement could not exclude premiums from income during the 2015 and 2016 tax years because it is not considered insurance and that it must recognize $781,977 in income for the 2015 tax year because the provisions allowing deferral of unearned premiums do not apply to entities that are not insurance companies.
-
July 25, 2025
Delaware High Court Remands No-Action Issue In D&O Coverage Dispute
WILMINGTON, Del. — The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s grant of insurers’ motions to dismiss a company and its CEOs’ lawsuit seeking directors and officers liability coverage under 2023 policies for an underlying lawsuit alleging that they undersold the value of investors’ shares in the company and its parent company but remanded for further consideration of issues related to the “No Action” clause under the 2021 insurance policies.
-
July 25, 2025
5th Circuit Affirms Ruling For IRS In Tax Row Over Purported Microcaptives
NEW ORLEANS — Upholding a ruling for the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in a federal tax dispute over purported microcaptive insurance arrangements, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals interpreted part of the Internal Revenue Code “to determine when supervisory approval was required, an issue of first impression in this circuit.”
-
July 25, 2025
New York Justice Partly Grants Insured’s Request To Review Discovery Order
NEW YORK — A New York justice granted in part a commodities investment manager insured’s request for review and clarification of a judicial hearing officer’s ruling regarding document discovery in an excess professional liability coverage dispute arising from underlying claims that the insured conspired to commit fraud.
-
July 24, 2025
Vendor Dismisses Insurer From Breach Of Contract Claim; 1 Defendant Remains
NEW YORK — The plaintiffs in dispute involving reinsurance and a warehouse in Afghanistan filed a notice of voluntary dismissal in a federal court in New York, dismissing its breach of contract claim against an insurer; the dismissal is without prejudice with each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs.
-
July 23, 2025
Insurer, Engineer File Verbal Notice Of Settlement Of Professional Negligence Suit
CHEYENNE, Wyo. — A homeowners insurer and a mechanical engineering firm indicated to a federal court in Wyoming that they have reached a settlement of the insurer’s negligence lawsuit arising from water damage that was allegedly caused by improperly installed plumbing.
-
July 22, 2025
Insurer: No Coverage Owed For Injuries Caused By Intentional Shooting Rampage
RALEIGH, N.C. — A homeowners insurer filed suit in a North Carolina federal court seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend and indemnify against an underlying lawsuit alleging that an unemancipated minor went on a shooting rampage that killed several people in a Raleigh neighborhood, contending that the underlying injuries were caused by intentional acts and not by an “occurrence” pursuant to the policy.
-
July 22, 2025
Insurer Appeals Ruling In D&O Coverage Dispute Over Unfair Dilution Claims
SAN DIEGO — A business and management indemnity insurer on July 21 filed a notice of appeal of a California federal court’s holding that it has a duty to defend and indemnify its insured against an underlying unfair dilution lawsuit because the “dilution claims exception” to the “insured vs. insured” exclusion restores directors and officers liability coverage.
-
July 22, 2025
Insurer: Exclusion Bars Coverage For Blake Lively’s Suit Against Justin Baldoni
NEW YORK — A management liability insurer filed suit in a New York federal court on July 21 seeking a declaration that it has no duty to provide coverage for Blake Lively’s sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation action against Justin Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios LLC, It Ends With Us Movie LLC and its movie studio officers, asserting that the policy’s prior knowledge exclusion bars coverage.
-
July 22, 2025
Michigan High Court Refuses To Disturb No Coverage Ruling For Personal Injury Suit
LANSING, Mich. — The Michigan Supreme Court denied an invitation to review an appeals court’s ruling that affirmed a lower court’s holding that a homeowners insurance policy’s intentional acts exclusion bars coverage for an underlying personal injury lawsuit, saying it is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by the state’s highest court.