Mealey's Data Privacy

  • September 12, 2025

    Debt Collector: 8th Circuit Suit Boosts Intrusion Upon Seclusion Certiorari Bid

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A debt collection firm, which asked the U.S. Supreme Court to clarify whether a single errantly sent letter is sufficiently comparable to the tort of intrusion upon seclusion to establish jurisdiction for a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), filed a supplemental brief telling the high court that a recent Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling, which conflicted with the ruling it appeals, further supports the need for a grant of certiorari on the matter.

  • September 12, 2025

    3rd Circuit Asks N.J. High Court Whether Data Shield Law Liability Needs Mens Rea

    PHILADELPHIA — Two months after hearing oral arguments in a dispute over the constitutionality of a New Jersey law that provides for deletion of public officials’ private information from data brokers’ records, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel certified two questions to the New Jersey Supreme Court, asking it to clarify whether a finding of liability under the statute requires a determination of a defendant’s mental state.

  • September 11, 2025

    IRS, ICE Must Give Judge Administrative Record Of Taxpayer Info-Sharing Policy

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a posthearing minute order, a District of Columbia federal judge directed the Internal Revenue Service and Immigration and Customs Enforcement to submit the administrative record related to a recently enacted policy under which the IRS agreed to share certain taxpayers’ last known addresses with ICE for immigration enforcement purposes, with the judge deeming the record necessary to resolve plaintiff organizations’ motion to stay or enjoin this new information-sharing policy as barred by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

  • September 10, 2025

    4th Circuit Stays Mandate In Unions’ DOGE Data Access Case Until Petition Decided

    RICHMOND, Va. — The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals temporarily stayed the mandate in an appeal over U.S. Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) access to individuals’ personally identifiable information (PII) until after a petition for rehearing en banc filed by the unions and veterans who brought the complaint is considered.

  • September 09, 2025

    Judge Rules Email Subscription Does Not Confer Consumer Status Under VPPA

    NEW YORK — A Missouri woman’s Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) claim against NBCUniversal Media LLC was dismissed for a third time by a New York federal judge who found that although the plaintiff sufficiently pleaded that NBC knowingly collected her personally identifiable information (PII) connected with her viewing of videos on the website of the Today Show, the plaintiff did not establish that she qualified as a consumer under the statute.

  • September 05, 2025

    Chinese Toymaker Settles FTC Claims Of Kids’ Location Data Sharing For $500,000

    SAN FRANCISCO — The United States and a Chinese toy company reached a settlement of claims that the company violated minors’ privacy through its collection of their geolocation data via the firm’s robot toys, telling a California federal court that they had agreed to a penalty of $500,000 to dispose of the claims brought under the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the Federal Trade Commission Act.

  • September 05, 2025

    Jury Awards Google Users More Than $425M For Online Data Gathering

    SAN FRANCISCO — After an 11-day trial in a five-year-old privacy class action, a California federal jury awarded two classes of mobile device users more than $425 million for invasion of privacy and intrusion upon seclusion by Google LLC for the company’s practice of tracking mobile device users’ online activity despite selecting a setting to opt out of such data collection.

  • September 05, 2025

    3rd Circuit: Policy Violations Not Federal Crimes, Passwords Not Trade Secrets

    PHILADELPHIA — Under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), workplace policy infractions are not federal crimes and federal and Pennsylvania laws do not hold that passwords protecting proprietary business information are trade secrets, a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found “for the first time” in affirming a district court ruling that two former employees of a national debt-collection firm did not commit computer fraud, steal trade secrets or violate other state and federal laws through the creation and sharing of a spreadsheet containing passwords and login information protecting “confidential and proprietary information.”

  • September 04, 2025

    Disney Settles Children’s Online Privacy Violations With FTC For $10 Million

    LOS ANGELES — In a stipulation and proposed order filed in California federal court, Disney Worldwide Services Inc. and Disney Entertainment Operations LLC (together, Disney) have agreed to pay $10 million to settle allegations by the Federal Trade Commission that it violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by not properly designating whether videos it uploaded to YouTube were made for kids (MFK), which resulted in the collection of children’s personal data.

  • September 03, 2025

    38 Amici Back Pregnancy Center In High Court Subpoena Row; DOJ Seeks To Argue

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — With the Sept. 2 filing of an amicus curiae brief by six pregnancy centers, 38 briefs have been filed in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the operator of New Jersey pregnancy centers that has resisted complying with a subpoena issued by the state’s attorney general seeking, among other things, the identities of the organization’s donors.

  • September 03, 2025

    X Corp., Privacy Group Back Convicted Robber’s Geofence Warrant Certiorari Bid

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Social network operator X Corp. and a nonprofit privacy rights organization filed amicus curiae briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting a petition for certiorari challenging the constitutionality of geofence warrants, which was filed by a man who was convicted of robbery based on geofence evidence.

  • September 03, 2025

    Judge Won’t Compel Claim Forms, Documents In Wawa Data Breach Settlement

    PHILADELPHIA — A Pennsylvania federal judge found no merit to objections raised by Wawa Inc. related to class members’ claims rate in responding to a preliminarily approved settlement agreement over a 2019 data breach, leading her to deny the convenience store chain’s motion to compel production of claim forms or communications between the settlement administrator and  counsel for plaintiff financial institutions (FIs).

  • September 02, 2025

    NBA Asks Supreme Court To Reject Invitation To Combine VPPA Petitions

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — For the second time in two weeks, the National Basketball Association  on Aug. 29 filed a supplemental brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reject an invitation to postpone the pending conference on its petition for certiorari over how to define a consumer under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), this time opposing a suggestion by the filer of a recently submitted certiorari petition in another VPPA lawsuit that the court consider both petitions in the same conference.

  • September 02, 2025

    Online Sports Fan Suggests Supreme Court Consider VPPA Cert Petitions Together

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Six days after a Texas woman filed a petition for certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider the standard for what constitutes “personally identifiable information” (PII) under the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA), she filed a letter proposing that, because of “overlap” with another case that is currently in the certiorari petition stage, the high court “may wish to consider” the two cases “during the same Conference.”

  • August 29, 2025

    9th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Session-Replay Suit For Lack Of Concrete Injury

    PASADENA, Calif. — Relying largely on TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel upheld a trial court’s dismissal of a privacy suit over a session-replay program created by Microsoft Corp., finding that a plaintiff did not establish standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution because she did not show that she suffered a harm that was “remotely similar” to one that has “traditionally been actionable in our nation’s legal system.”

  • August 28, 2025

    Texas Appeals Court: Hospital Is Immune From Data Breach Suit, Subsidiary Isn’t

    HOUSTON — Partly affirming the dismissal of a consolidated lawsuit brought by patients over the exposure of their personally identifiable information (PII) in a hospital’s data breach, a Texas appeals court panel found that the hospital sufficiently established that it was immune from the claims due to its status as a government entity.

  • August 27, 2025

    Judge Issues Mixed Ruling On Federal Preemption Of New Jersey Data Shield Law

    CAMDEN, N.J. — Addressing an argument that was not covered in a June memorandum, a New Jersey federal judge delivered a mixed ruling on certain defendants’ arguments that a state law protecting law enforcement and court personnel’s private information is preempted by federal laws.

  • August 27, 2025

    Judge Dismisses Civil Rights Claims In Privacy Suit Over Educational Software

    CHICAGO — An Illinois federal judge found no jurisdiction over one defendant, dismissing it from a putative class action alleging improper collection of students’ personal information via an educational software platform, and also dismissed claims brought against other defendants under federal civil rights law.

  • August 26, 2025

    Illinois Panel Reverses Class Certification In Pepperidge Farm BIPA Case

    CHICAGO — A trial court must “make explicit findings as to whether any possible conflict of interest” exists as to class counsel in an Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) case brought against Pepperidge Farm Inc. by an employee, an Illinois appellate panel ruled Aug. 25, reversing class certification after the sole named plaintiff’s daughter’s firm was permitted to remain as class counsel.

  • August 26, 2025

    BIPA Suit Against Coinbase Stayed Pending 7th Circuit Ruling In Parallel Suit

    CHICAGO — Granting a motion by Coinbase Inc., an Illinois federal judge stayed a putative class action accusing the cryptocurrency exchange operator of violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by using photos in its user authentication process, with the judge concluding that the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ upcoming ruling in another case pertaining to user authentication using biometric identifiers is likely to affect the issues in the present case.

  • August 25, 2025

    Plaintiffs Suing Therapy App For Privacy Violations May Proceed Anonymously

    SAN FRANCISCO — The anonymity of putative class plaintiffs accusing online therapy company BetterHelp Inc. of violating privacy laws by selling their personal data to third parties in violation of California’s unfair competition law (UCL) does not require dismissal, a California federal judge ruled in denying the company’s motion to dismiss, citing the nature of the plaintiffs’ privacy protection claims.

  • August 22, 2025

    Pregnancy Center To High Court: Federal Suit Doesn’t Require State Court Ruling

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — In its Aug. 21 merits brief, a nonprofit, faith-based pregnancy center asks the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the center’s constitutional challenge of a government investigative subpoena seeking donors’ personal information is not ripe because a state court had not ruled on the matter.

  • August 21, 2025

    Apex Doctrine At Issue In Mandamus Petition Over Zuckerberg Deposition

    SAN FRANCISCO — Meta Platforms Inc. asked the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals to grant its petition for mandamus and provide guidance on application of the apex doctrine as the tech company seeks to avoid a lower court’s order that Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg be deposed in a suit over the purported collection of Facebook users’ protected health information (PHI).

  • August 20, 2025

    YouTube, Minor Users Announce $30 Million Settlement Of Privacy Row

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — Seeking to end an almost 6-year-old lawsuit over YouTube LLC’s purported collection of the personally identifiable information (PII) of minor users, a group of plaintiffs who sued YouTube and Google LLC for such alleged privacy violations moved in California federal court for preliminary approval of a $30 million settlement.

  • August 20, 2025

    Man Says Otter Notetaker Records, Saves Conversations Without Consent

    SAN JOSE, Calif. — A California man alleges that Otter.ai Inc. does not obtain prior consent of all participants in a virtual meeting before its Notetaker transcription app is engaged to record a conversation, leveling claims of computer fraud, invasion of privacy and unfair competition against the artificial intelligence (AI) technology firm in California federal court.