Mealey's Intellectual Property
-
October 17, 2025
Judge Won’t Hasten Damages Deadline, Says Anthropic Must Face Copyright Claims
SAN JOSE, Calif. — In a pair of rulings, a federal judge in California said she would not hasten previous deadlines for music publishers to produce damages estimates and that the artificial intelligence copyright claims against Anthropic PBC may proceed.
-
October 16, 2025
Brita’s ITC Patent Loss Affirmed By Federal Circuit
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A panel in the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 15 affirmed a finding by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that certain claims of a water filter patent held by Brita LP were invalid for lack of written description and lack of enablement because the patent does not disclose the full scope of filter material covered by its claims that do not meet a claimed performance metric.
-
October 16, 2025
Federal Circuit Rejects Rehearing Bid From Database Patent Holder In IPR Appeal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals rejected a technology company’s petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, rejecting its arguments that a panel used the wrong standard of review to find that the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) erred in claim construction and incorrectly rejected reply evidence from Google LLC in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings it brought.
-
October 16, 2025
Federal Circuit: Judge Wrong To Find Prior PTAB Ruling Precluded Issues
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Wisconsin federal judge was wrong to apply issue preclusion based on prior findings from the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) when granting summary judgment in a patent infringement dispute over eyeglass lens patents, a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Oct. 15; the panel said the PTAB findings relied on by the judge came under a different standard of proof than that required for district courts.
-
October 16, 2025
Labels Tell High Court ISP Knowingly Provided Service To Infringers
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Record labels and music publishers tell the U.S. Supreme Court in an Oct. 15 response brief that an internet service provider (ISP) continued to provide internet service to individuals it knew were “‘habitual offenders’” of piracy, thus making the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ finding of contributory infringement correct.
-
October 15, 2025
Copyright Protection Extends To AI Images, Man Tells Supreme Court
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Copyright protections are in place to ensure dissemination of creative works to the public and are invoked even when a human is not the creator and should apply to artificial intelligence-generated outputs for the same reasons, a man tells the U.S. Supreme Court in a petition for a writ of certiorari.
-
October 15, 2025
Federal Circuit Rejects Rehearing Bid For Dumbbell Abstractness Finding
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Oct. 14 denied a company’s request for either panel rehearing or rehearing en banc, leaving in place its August finding that a Utah federal judge was wrong to hold that a patent was directed to an abstract idea by conflating a “rather simple mechanical invention” for stacking dumbbells with the kind of computerized automation that is often unpatentable as abstract.
-
October 15, 2025
Willful Infringement Claim Survives Dismissal In Gene Sequencing Patent Dispute
WILMINGTON, Del. — A federal judge in Delaware denied a biotechnology company’s motion to partially dismiss a patent infringement complaint brought against it by a research institution, finding that the research entity plausibly alleged willful infringement of two of its cancer-detection patents based on related European patent disputes.
-
October 14, 2025
6th Circuit Affirms Contempt Finding In Kentucky Colonel Trademark Dispute
CINCINNATI — The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held Oct. 14 that a Kentucky federal judge did not abuse her discretion by holding a pro se appellant in contempt for failing to comply with a permanent injunction barring him from using a mark associated with the honorary title of “Kentucky Colonel.” The panel also affirmed the judge’s decision to order the man to pay attorney fees and costs.
-
October 14, 2025
OpenAI, News Plaintiffs Reach Agreement Ending ChatGPT Output Preservation
SAN FRANCISCO — OpenAI entities will no longer have to preserve all ChatGPT outputs after reaching an agreement with news plaintiffs about the scope of what must be saved for copyright litigation consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
-
October 14, 2025
11th Circuit Finds Sanctionable Conduct In Energy Drink IP Row But Vacates Award
ATLANTA — An 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel affirmed a Florida federal judge’s finding of bad faith against an energy drink maker’s counsel in a trade dress infringement dispute against rival drink makers, agreeing that the attorneys engaged in sanctionable conduct during the discovery process; however, the panel vacated the judge’s nearly $250,000 sanctions award, finding it to have been improperly calculated.
-
October 14, 2025
Insurance Holding Company Sues Captive Operator, Seeks Preliminary Injunction
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — An insurance holding company seeks a preliminary injunction in a Florida federal court against a captive operator and its associated entities it accuses of counterfeiting its name and trademarks to sell fake commercial insurance policies through two purported captive programs; in a concurrent complaint, the insurance holding company alleges direct, contributory and vicarious trademark infringement under the Lanham Act and unfair competition under several state common laws and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief.
-
October 13, 2025
9th Circuit Affirms $4 Million Judgment Against Supplement Counterfeiters
SAN FRANCISCO — A panel in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a California federal judge’s decision to award a supplement maker and its founder a $4 million judgment and nearly $5.3 million in attorney fees after entering default judgment against entities that the supplement maker accused of counterfeiting its products, finding that the appellant entities were not prejudiced by the judge’s decision to enter default judgment without considering the entities’ motions to set aside default.
-
October 13, 2025
9th Circuit Affirms Judgment For Car Maker In ‘Lambo’ Cybersquatting Dispute
SAN FRANCISCO — A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found no error in an Arizona federal judge’s grant of summary judgment to Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. (Lamborghini) in a cybersquatting dispute with a web domain holder, agreeing that the attempt to sell the domain “lambo.com” to the luxury carmaker for $75 million was indicative of bad faith.
-
October 10, 2025
Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidation Of Hearing Device Patent Claims
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Across three opinions issued Oct. 9, two panels in the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a series of decisions by the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that invalidated multiple claims in three patents related to hearing devices, with the panels agreeing with PTAB that prior art references rendered the patents’ claims obvious.
-
October 10, 2025
Judge Finds Plaintiff Owns No U.S. Rights To Mexican Band’s Mark
DALLAS — A Texas federal judge held that a 2009 agreement regarding the intellectual property rights associated with a band from Mexico concerned trademark rights in that country only and not those in the United States, dooming much of a complaint brought by the son of the band’s longtime manager against the daughter of a founding member and other individuals.
-
October 09, 2025
More Amici Urge Supreme Court To Take Up Entresto Patent Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Public Interest Patent Law Institute (PIPLI) tells the U.S. Supreme Court in an Oct. 8 amicus curiae brief that it should grant a generic drugmaker’s petition for a writ of certiorari in a dispute over the patent for heart medication Entresto, arguing that the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has created conflicting strategies on how to treat after-arising technology.
-
October 09, 2025
PTAB Erred In Bone Plate Patent Anticipation Finding, Federal Circuit Says
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel has narrowed a medical device company’s wins before the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB); while the panel affirmed PTAB’s findings as to one of the patents at issue, it also found that substantial evidence did not support the board’s rejection of arguments regarding whether three other patents at issue were anticipated.
-
October 08, 2025
Anthropic Must Face Copyright Claims As It Fights For Damages Disclosures
SAN JOSE, Calif. — A federal judge in California said music publishers’ artificial intelligence copyright claims against Anthropic PBC may proceed just days after the company asked for relief from a magistrate judge’s conclusion that the case’s novelty and complexity permitted delaying the disclosure of potential damages.
-
October 08, 2025
Judge Tosses Athletics Fansite Copyright Suit Against Sports Fan Page Company
ABERDEEN, Miss. — A Mississippi federal judge on Oct. 7 dismissed without prejudice a copyright infringement suit alleging that a company that maintains Facebook fan pages for U.S. professional and college sports violated the intellectual property rights of a Mississippi State University internet fansite, finding that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the suit because the fansite failed to show that the fan page company is “subject to personal jurisdiction” in Mississippi.
-
October 08, 2025
Panel: Patent Organizations Lacked Standing To Sue PTO For Rules Change
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A panel in the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed a District of Columbia federal judge’s decision to dismiss a complaint brought against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) by two organizations that represent patent holders, agreeing with the judge that the organizations lacked standing because they could not show they were injured by the PTO’s decision to deny their petition for rulemaking.
-
October 08, 2025
Judge: Brief Correcting AI Errors May Not Contain New Arguments
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California in a contract and copyright infringement case granted an administrative request to withdraw a summary judgment motion containing artificial intelligence-generated errors, but said that as a sanction, the refiled brief cannot contain new arguments or authorities.
-
October 08, 2025
Federal Circuit Vacates $20M Patent Award Because Plaintiff Didn’t Own Patents
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held that a medical device company lacked standing to bring infringement claims against another device maker because it did not own the patents at issue when the suit was filed; the panel vacated a Massachusetts federal judge’s findings of infringement and remanded with instructions to dismiss.
-
October 08, 2025
High Court Won’t Consider If Federal Circuit Erred On Hip Implant Color Mark
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a medical ceramics company’s petition for a writ of certiorari, leaving in place a Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals holding that the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) correctly canceled its marks because the pink color of its artificial hip parts was a functional element of an expired patent.
-
October 07, 2025
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari To Crocs In Sprawling Patent, False Ad Row
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 6 denied Crocs Inc.’s petition for a writ of certiorari in which the company argued that the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals improperly expanded the federal false advertising statute to include intangible concepts, including statements about whether a product is patented.