Express Scripts, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United States of America

  1. July 02, 2025

    Top Federal Tax Cases Of 2025: Midyear Report

    In the first half of the year, the U.S. Supreme Court barred a defunct transportation company's bankruptcy trustee from clawing back federal taxes and prevented the U.S. Tax Court from reviewing a collection dispute after the IRS stopped going after the underlying debt. In Arizona, a federal judge refused to block the IRS from issuing batch denials of pandemic-era worker credit claims. Here, Law360 reviews some of the top federal court decisions from the past six months.

  2. May 09, 2025

    Express Scripts To Appeal Denied Tax Break In $43M Suit

    Express Scripts is appealing rulings denying it a $43 million tax refund for domestic production activities after a Missouri federal court said the company did not qualify because it did not grant licenses to pharmacy benefit plan sponsors who used its software, the pharmacy benefit manager said Friday.

  3. March 18, 2025

    Express Scripts Denied Tax Break For Software In $43M Suit

    Express Scripts is not entitled to a tax deduction for domestic production activities related to its software because it did not grant licenses to pharmacy benefit plan sponsors who used it, a Missouri federal court said Tuesday, denying the company's request for a tax refund in its $43 million case.

  4. February 24, 2025

    Express Scripts Sees Claims Cut From $43M Tax Refund Suit

    A Missouri federal court on Monday tossed some of Express Scripts' claims for a $42.9 million tax refund formerly available for domestic production, saying the pharmacy benefit manager improperly reversed course on whether certain costs should be included in its calculation of the tax break.

  5. June 22, 2021

    Express Scripts Seeks $43M Refund For Production Deduction

    Pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts is seeking a $42.9 million refund from the IRS in Missouri federal court, arguing in a complaint Tuesday that the agency incorrectly denied the company a deduction formerly available for domestic production activities.