June 04, 2025

Taewoo Kim, et al v. Jump Trading, LLC, et al

Track this case

Case Number:

25-1964

Court:

Appellate - 7th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

3850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity


Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


Coverage

  1. August 13, 2026

    'Jump Must Litigate': 7th Circ. Clarifies Arb. Enforcement Rule

    The Seventh Circuit rejected trading firm Jump Trading LLC's bid to arbitrate a putative securities class action Thursday, finding that courts, not arbitrators, must decide whether disputes belong in arbitration when the parties haven't signed an arbitration agreement, furthering a circuit split and holding that "Jump must litigate."

2 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS