Luxottica Franchisee Gets Another Shot At Antitrust Claims

By Bryan Koenig · February 11, 2026, 7:46 PM EST

An Ohio federal judge partially reversed course Wednesday after previously permanently tossing a Luxottica franchisee's antitrust claims, concluding that an attempt to amend them wouldn't be futile because it might be...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Brave Optical Inc. et al v. Luxottica of America Inc.

Case Number

Court

Ohio Southern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Franchise

Date Filed

December 04, 2023

Recent Articles By Bryan

February 04, 2026
Express Scripts Makes 'Fundamental Changes' In FTC Deal
January 29, 2026
Sandoz, Teva Beat Malicious Prosecution Claims, For Now
January 28, 2026
Teva Allowed New Mifepristone Claim But Not New Defendant
January 23, 2026
$200M Sun, Taro Generics Deal Gets Final OK
January 15, 2026
Trial 'No Longer Warranted' After Judge's Stelara Reversal
January 15, 2026
CVS Ducks Antitrust But Not Biz Interference Claim At 5th Circ.
January 14, 2026
6th Circ. Skips Rethink, But Still Spars Over Indirect Buyer Bar
January 14, 2026
Vizient Beats Spurned Medical Tape Supplier At 5th Circ.
January 08, 2026
FTC Battles Edwards On Eve Of Heart Valve Merger Deadline
January 06, 2026
Cigna Accused Of Rigging Market For Life-Saving Drugs