December 30, 2016
In re Lantus Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:16-cv-12652
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Andersen Tate
- Elias Law Group LLP
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Foley Hoag
- Garwin Gerstein
- Hagens Berman
- Jones Day
- Lockridge Grindal
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Radice Law Firm
- Smith Segura Raphael & Leger
- Sperling Kenny
- Walsh Pizzi
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 10, 2026
Sanofi Says Judge Botched Insulin Device Patent Listings
Sanofi-Aventis sparred with drug wholesalers over a Massachusetts federal magistrate judge's pronouncements that the parties should go to trial on claims the pharmaceutical giant used improper insulin device patent listings to anticompetitively protect the blockbuster Lantus insulin pen from competition.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login