CareDx Inc v. Natera Inc

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

23-2427

Court:

Appellate - 3rd Circuit

Nature of Suit:

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. October 14, 2025

    Full 3rd Circ. Won't Rethink $45M CareDx False Ad Case

    The Third Circuit on Tuesday turned down medical testing company CareDx's request to have a full panel mull whether to reinstate a $45 million jury award in a false advertisement case over genetic testing technology against rival Natera.

  2. October 06, 2025

    Law Profs Say CareDx False Ad Verdict Should Stand

    Two law professors have urged the Third Circuit to grant medical testing company CareDx's request for another chance to argue why its $45 million false advertising verdict against a rival should be reinstated, saying a ruling nixing the verdict will disallow juries from using circumstantial evidence and encourage false advertisers to "try their luck."

  3. September 26, 2025

    CareDx Asks 3rd Circ. To Rethink $45M False Ad Case

    Medical testing company CareDx has asked the Third Circuit for a panel rehearing or a rehearing before the entire circuit to consider reinstating a $45 million jury award in a false advertisement case over genetic testing technology against rival Natera.

  4. August 28, 2025

    3rd Circ. Agrees Natera Doesn't Owe $45M In False Ad Fight

    The Third Circuit Thursday affirmed a lower court's decision to take genetic testing company Natera off the hook from paying $45 million in damages to rival CareDx, saying in an unpublished opinion that CareDx failed to prove Natera actually deceived consumers through false statements about a Natera test's superiority.

  5. October 08, 2024

    3rd Circ. Directs Court To Explain If Natera Ads 'Literally False'

    A Third Circuit panel on Tuesday sent allegations of false advertising against medical test maker Natera back to district court, directing the judge to determine whether a jury had sufficient evidence last year to find that eight of the company's advertisements were "literally false."