Adams v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

2:23-cv-01773

Court:

California Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Daniel J. Calabretta

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. February 27, 2026

    Credit Bureaus Fight Bid To Add Plaintiffs, Claims To Suit

    Medical providers and a collection agency in a proposed class action accusing Equifax, Experian and TransUnion of conspiring to exclude less than $500 in medical debt from consumer credit reports lack good cause to again amend their complaint, the credit reporting agencies told a federal court. 

  2. January 23, 2026

    Providers Oppose Credit Bureaus' Medical Debt Appeal

    A proposed class of medical providers and collection agencies accusing Equifax, Experian and TransUnion of colluding to exclude medical debt under $500 from consumer credit reports is opposing a bid by the credit bureaus to expedite an appeal of a ruling that denied dismissal of the claims.

  3. December 04, 2025

    Credit Bureaus Can't Duck Suit Over Excluded Medical Debt

    A California federal judge has found that Equifax, Experian and TransUnion must face key parts of a rejiggered proposed antitrust class action from medical practices and collection agencies targeting the credit reporting agencies' decision to exclude medical debt under $500 from consumer credit reports.

  4. March 03, 2025

    Credit Bureaus Look To Duck Renewed Medical Debt Claims

    Equifax, Experian and TransUnion asked a California federal judge Monday to toss an updated case accusing the credit reporting agencies of violating antitrust law by agreeing to exclude medical debt under $500 from consumer credit reports.

  5. January 06, 2025

    Medical Debt Suit Against Credit Bureaus Tossed, For Now

    A California federal judge tossed a proposed class action accusing Equifax, Experian and TransUnion of violating antitrust law by agreeing to exclude medical debt under $500 from consumer credit reports, but the judge gave the medical providers that filed the suit a chance to amend their complaint.