In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:17-md-02804

See also:

Court:

Ohio Northern

Nature of Suit:

P.I.: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action, Multi-district Litigation

Judge:

Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 28

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. May 26, 2022

    Teva And Cephalon's Marketing Ignored Plea Deal, Judge Told

    Teva and Cephalon improperly peddled their painkiller Fentora even after Cephalon reached a 2008 plea agreement to resolve criminal claims it marketed a different opioid for unapproved uses, San Francisco's lawyer told the federal judge overseeing a bench trial on claims the companies and others illegally fueled the city's opioid epidemic.

  2. May 23, 2022

    DEA Draws Judge's Ire In Calif. Opioid Trial

    The federal judge overseeing a high-stakes trial related to San Francisco's opioid crisis said testimony from an ex-Actavis executive Monday about the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration reminded him of the agency's flawed handling of an opioid concern in another case, saying the government had "failed" in that matter.

  3. May 19, 2022

    SF Fire Dept. Treats 7 Opioid Overdoses Daily, Judge Told

    A San Francisco Fire Department official testified in a bellwether opioid bench trial Thursday that opioid abuse has become so prevalent in the city that emergency responders now treat an average of seven overdoses daily, whereas public overdoses were a rare occurrence in the early 2000s.

  4. May 17, 2022

    Teva Unit Marketed Opioid For Off-Label Uses, Judge Hears

    Teva unit Cephalon saw sales of its opioid lollipop Actiq soar after it began marketing the product for non-FDA approved off-label uses, a judge heard Tuesday in recorded testimony from ex-Cephalon employees in a bellwether trial over claims the drugmaker and others illegally fueled San Francisco's opioid epidemic.

  5. May 17, 2022

    Ohio Counties Put On Show In Opioid Damages Trial

    Two Northeast Ohio counties on Tuesday deployed a lawyer known for his folksy trial persona to cross-examine two expert witnesses for three major pharmacy chains that are trying to minimize how much they will have to pay after a jury found them liable for their role in the opioid epidemic.

  6. May 16, 2022

    Doctors' Opioid Data Kept From Walgreens Stores, Judge Told

    Walgreens tracked the prescription habits of doctors but didn't make the database available to stores because it might "cloud" the judgment of a pharmacist filling a prescription, a judge heard in recorded testimony Monday in a bellwether trial over claims that Walgreens and others illegally fueled San Francisco's opioid epidemic.

  7. May 16, 2022

    Counties Bungled $875M Ask After Opioid Trial, Judge Told

    A Stanford University professor told a judge Monday that three pharmacy chains should pay a small fraction of the roughly $875 million that two Northeast Ohio counties seek for the role a jury found the pharmacies played in the opioid crisis, arguing that the plaintiffs' experts botched some calculations.

  8. May 12, 2022

    Walgreens' Priority Was Filling Drug Orders Fast, Judge Told

    A former Walgreens pharmacist felt pressured to "fill, fill, fill" prescriptions while working at a pace that made her fear making fatal errors, a California federal judge heard in recorded testimony Thursday in a multibillion-dollar bellwether trial over claims Walgreens and others illegally fueled San Francisco's opioid epidemic.

  9. May 11, 2022

    Walgreens' Opioid Orders Like A 'Time Bomb,' Judge Told

    The increasing numbers of opioids ordered by Walgreens pharmacies after 2010 felt like an uncontrollable "ticking time bomb," a former warehouse manager for the company said in recorded testimony screened Wednesday at a bellwether trial over claims the drugstore giant and others illegally fueled San Francisco's opioid epidemic.

  10. May 11, 2022

    Opioid Jurors Detail Talks As Pharmacy Trial Gets Feisty Start

    An opioid trial to determine remedies after a jury verdict against CVS, Walgreens and Walmart commenced colorfully and combatively Tuesday as plaintiffs counsel floated metaphors involving spaghetti and cake, pharmacies encountered judicial pushback when challenging a key expert, and former jurors took Law360 behind the scenes of their deliberations.