January 09, 2020
Masimo Corporation et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
8:20-cv-00048
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Friedland Cianfrani
- Gibson Dunn
- Haynes Boone
- Knobbe Martens
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Morgan Lewis
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 18, 2026
Apple Took Masimo IP But No Remedy Warranted, Judge Says
A California federal judge determined Apple misappropriated two out of five of Masimo Corp.'s asserted trade secrets related to pulse oximetry technology for its smartwatches, but found Masimo's requests for an injunction and attorney fees unwarranted, according to a December bench trial ruling that was unsealed this week.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login