Law360 Insurance Authority
Law360 Insurance Authority Law360 Insurance Authority
  Sign In
Close
  • Law360
  • Law360
  • Law360 UK
  • Law360 Pulse
  • Law360 Employment Authority
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 Real Estate Authority
  • Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
  • Law360 Healthcare Authority
  • Sections
  • Home
  • Property
  • General Liability
  • Specialty Lines
  • Site Menu
  • About Insurance Authority
  • Contact Us
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • About Law360 Authority
Property ···  General Liability ···  Specialty Lines ···  COVID-19 Case Tracker  ···  More
  ||  
  • Advanced Search

Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Track this case

Case Number:

21-454

Court:

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit:

2893 Environmental Matters

Firms

  • Baker Botts
  • Best Best & Krieger
  • Complex Appellate Litigation Group
  • Consovoy McCarthy
  • Covington & Burling
  • Crowell & Moring
  • Gunster Yoakley
  • Hogan Lovells
  • Hunton Andrews
  • Kassouni Law
  • Kazmarek Mowrey
  • Mayer Brown
  • Pollock Cohen
  • Selendy Gay
  • Smouse & Mason
  • Venable LLP
  • Vinson & Elkins
  • Wiley Rein

Companies

  • American Petroleum Institute Inc.
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation
  • Association of American Railroads
  • Atlantic Legal Foundation Inc.
  • Cato Institute
  • Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
  • National Association of Clean Water Agencies
  • National Association of Home Builders
  • National Cattlemen's Beef Association
  • Public Citizen Inc.

Government Agencies

  • Menominee Indian Tribe
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Sectors & Industries:

  • Basic Materials
    • Copper
    • Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
  • Consumer Goods
    • Meat Products
  • Industrial Goods
    • Residential Construction
  • Services
    • Business Services
    • Legal services
    • Personal Services
    • Public Relations Services
    • Railroads
  1. September 23, 2021

    High Court Asked To Revisit Landmark Water Permit Ruling

    Idaho landowners who say they should not be forced to apply for a Clean Water Act permit for a home construction project on Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit a landmark ruling that set guidelines for when the statute applies in permitting decisions.

    • ← Previous
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • Next →
RELX Group Lexis Nexis

© 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About Insurance Authority | Contact Us | Advertise with Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Ad Choices