Angell v. GEICO Advantage Ins

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

22-20093

Court:

Appellate - 5th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

4110 Insurance

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. June 14, 2023

    Geico Loses Bid For Full 5th Circ. Rehearing Over Class Cert.

    Geico has lost its bid for an en banc rehearing of the Fifth Circuit's May decision to uphold a Texas federal court's certification of a class of policyholders who alleged the insurer underpaid the actual cash value of their totaled vehicles, according to an order issued by the panel Wednesday.

  2. May 30, 2023

    Geico Asks Full 5th Circ. To Reconsider Class Cert. Ruling

    Geico urged the Fifth Circuit to grant an en banc rehearing of the court's decision to affirm the certification of a class of policyholders claiming the insurer underpaid the actual cash value of their totaled vehicles, arguing the appellate court contradicted U.S. Supreme Court and circuit precedent.

  3. May 15, 2023

    5th Circ. Affirms Class Cert. In Geico Total-Loss Suit

    A certified class of policyholders can proceed with their suit accusing Geico of underpaying the actual cash value of their totaled vehicles, the Fifth Circuit ruled, finding that classwide treatment is proper despite differences in the amounts of so-called purchasing fees the policyholders say the insurer owes them.

  4. February 08, 2023

    Geico Tells 5th Circ. Class Reps Are Atypical

    Geico urged a Fifth Circuit panel to undo a Texas federal judge's decision to certify a class of customers who say the insurer shorted them on repayments for damaged vehicles, arguing on Wednesday that the lead plaintiffs in the suit are making claims that don't apply to the majority of the class.

  5. June 24, 2022

    Geico Asks 5th Circ. To Ax Class Cert. In Total-Loss Suit

    Geico and a slew of affiliates urged the Fifth Circuit to reverse a Texas federal judge's ruling certifying a class action accusing the insurer of underpaying policyholders for the actual cash value of their totaled vehicles, saying the lower court made a number of distinct errors.