Evanston Insurance Company v. NexGen Pharmaceuticals, LLC

Track this case

Case Number:

4:22-cv-00720

Court:

Texas Northern

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Insurance

Judge:

Reed C. O'Connor

Firms

  1. February 05, 2024

    Insurer, Pharmacy Settle Horse Death Coverage Dispute

    A coverage dispute between an insurer and a veterinary pharmacy over defense and indemnity for an underlying action involving the deaths of two horses was settled between the two parties Monday in Texas federal court.

  2. November 22, 2023

    Pharmacy's Coverage Didn't Transfer Post-Merger, Court Told

    An insurer urged a Texas federal judge Wednesday to rule in its favor on claims that it needn't cover a veterinary pharmacy in an underlying dispute over the deaths of two horses, arguing that coverage did not automatically transfer to the pharmacy after a merger.

  3. November 16, 2023

    Pharmacy's Counterclaims Axed In Horse Death Coverage Suit

    A Texas federal court tossed a veterinary compounding pharmacy's counterclaims against its insurer in a dispute over coverage for an underlying suit over the deaths of two horses that were prescribed the wrong medication, finding the pharmacy's bid for declaratory relief duplicative.

  4. October 05, 2023

    Pharmacy Says Insurer Must Cover Horse Deaths Suit

    A compounding pharmacy's insurer must cover an underlying suit accusing the pharmacy of negligently causing the death of two horses by prescribing the wrong medication, the pharmacy told a Texas federal court, arguing it did not breach a "change in control of named insured" provision in the policy.

  5. August 22, 2022

    Insurer Says Pharmacy Owed No Defense Over Dead Horses

    Evanston Insurance Co. asked a Texas federal judge to find it has no obligation to defend a compounding pharmacy accused of killing two competitive horses with incorrect medication because the pharmacist did not inform the insurer that it merged with another business and assumed a new name.