General Liability

  • January 02, 2024

    Blue Cross Slashed Benefits, But Not Premiums, Suit Says

    A putative class action in Illinois state court has alleged Blue Cross Blue Shield and some of its subsidiaries reduced death benefits for life insurance customers when they turned 65 and again at 70, and then refused to refund the involuntary overpayments.

  • January 02, 2024

    Bias Invalidates Bombing Coverage Award, Property Co. Says

    A Nashville, Tennessee, property owner urged a federal court to set aside an appraisal award in a coverage dispute over damage caused by a Christmas Day bombing in 2020, saying a Zurich unit's appraiser created bias and partiality in the umpire in favor of the insurer.

  • January 02, 2024

    Insurer Loses Bid To Narrow Fire Loss Coverage Suit's Scope

    A New York federal judge rejected an insurer's attempts to limit the scope of a fire coverage lawsuit brought by a Tennessee-based packaging manufacturer, finding the insurer hadn't made valid arguments for the dismissal of a bad faith claim or the exclusion of a loss-run document.

  • January 01, 2024

    Colorado Cases To Watch In 2024

    Colorado judges this year will have to handle sprawling wildfire litigation, decide the breadth of protection for ski resorts and answer open questions affecting insurance policies for homeowners, employers and beyond. Law360 looks at several cases Colorado lawyers will be keeping tabs on in 2024.

  • January 01, 2024

    Illinois Cases To Watch In 2024

    One of the biggest players in Illinois politics faces a criminal racketeering trial, a host of lawsuits filed under a decades-old genetic information privacy law will advance and the state's high court is expected to further weigh in on insurance coverage for litigation under the state's biometric privacy statute in some of the Illinois cases to watch in 2024.

  • January 01, 2024

    General Liability Cases To Watch In 2024

    The first half of 2024 is poised to produce some significant commercial general liability coverage decisions, including a potential ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court on an insurer's fight for standing in an asbestos bankruptcy settlement. Here, Law360 looks at the cases to watch for in the early months of the new year.

  • January 01, 2024

    Insurance Legislation And Regulation To Watch In 2024

    The insurance industry is entering 2024 with a full plate of hot topic issues for legislation and regulation, including climate risk and data privacy, as rulemakers attempt to keep up with developing technologies and tackle home insurance challenges in vulnerable states. Here, Law360 looks at legislation and regulation topics the insurance industry will watch in the new year.

  • January 01, 2024

    Michigan Legislation To Watch In 2024

    As state lawmakers return to Lansing this month, lawyers will be keeping a close eye on Democrat-led proposals to create a robust paid family leave system, repeal a ban on local employment and labor laws, and dramatically expand sexual assault victims' ability to file lawsuits. Law360 highlights some of the most significant bills the Legislature could take up this year.

  • January 01, 2024

    The 5 Strangest Insurance Cases Of 2023

    Insurance protects policyholders from unforeseen situations, but some circumstances are so strange that even insurers couldn't have predicted them. Here, Law360 looks back on the strangest insurance cases of 2023.

  • January 01, 2024

    Biggest General Liability Rulings From 2023's Second Half

    Federal and state appeals courts provided general liability insurance practitioners with a handful of thought-provoking rulings in coverage disputes involving some hotly debated issues. Here, Law360 takes a look at the biggest rulings from the second half of 2023.

  • December 21, 2023

    Hartford Wants Out Of Countertop Co.'s Silica Exposure Suits

    An insurer asked a California federal court to find that it needn't defend or indemnify a countertop manufacturing company in a series of underlying suits from former employees who allege the company's materials exposed them to dangerous levels of silica.

  • December 21, 2023

    Subcontractor, Insurer Hit With $900K Project Delay Suit

    A construction contractor took a subcontractor and an insurer acting as its surety to federal court, claiming they owe more than $900,000 for losses related to delays caused by deficient work on a project in Virginia.

  • December 21, 2023

    Taxpayer Group Seeks Revival Of San Jose Gun Law Fight

    A California taxpayers association urged the Ninth Circuit to revive its challenge to the city of San Jose's ordinance requiring gun owners to pay an annual gun harm reduction fee to a designated organization, saying a compelled donation to a private nonprofit violates gun owners' First Amendment rights.

  • December 21, 2023

    Utica Owes Coverage In Slip-And-Fall Suit, Travelers Says

    Travelers told a New York federal court Thursday that the insurer for a subcontractor owes primary coverage to the primary contractor for an underlying suit claiming a pedestrian slipped on wet concrete outside a Bronx construction site.

  • December 21, 2023

    Crum & Forster, Contractor Settle Sewer Damage Dispute

    Crum & Forster and a general contractor accusing the insurer of failing to provide a "prompt and proper" defense in an underlying lawsuit over a damaged sewer line reached an agreement to resolve their dispute, the pair told a Washington federal court.

  • December 21, 2023

    Insurer, Condo Groups Resolve Cancer Suit Coverage Fight

    An insurer for a pair of Palm Beach County, Florida, condominium associations agreed to toss its dispute over coverage for a resident's suit claiming that her exposure to fumes from a diesel generator caused her cancer, after informing a federal court that the parties had reached a settlement.

  • December 20, 2023

    Vague Policy Language Should Net Win In BIPA Suit, Co. Says

    A medical device manufacturer told an Illinois federal court it should be granted a win over two Hanover units in connection with an underlying class action alleging biometric privacy violations, claiming the vague language in certain exclusions means they can't apply to bar coverage.

  • December 20, 2023

    Ga. Mold Death Coverage Suit Is Ripe, Insurer Says

    An insurer told a Georgia federal court not to dismiss its case disclaiming coverage of an apartment complex accused in an underlying suit of failing to quell a mold infestation that killed a tenant. 

  • December 20, 2023

    Insurers Settle Dispute Over 'Trashed' Art Suit Coverage

    A commercial liability insurer and a museum collections and loan insurer settled a suit in California federal court over defense and indemnity obligations owed in an underlying suit in the same court over supposedly "trashed" art.

  • December 20, 2023

    Jury To Hear Insurance Dispute Over $95M Fla. Mansion

    A Florida federal judge indicated Wednesday she will send a multimillion-dollar dispute between homeowners and American Home Assurance Co. Inc. over a Hurricane Irma damage claim involving a $95 million mansion to a jury and would have to push back a January trial date.

  • December 20, 2023

    Auto Body Shop Not Covered For Worker Injury, Insurer Says

    A Travelers unit said it has no duty to defend or indemnify a West Hollywood auto body shop in an underlying suit over a worker's on-the-job injury, telling a California federal court that the shop's commercial general liability policy does not cover injuries to employees.

  • December 20, 2023

    La. Supreme Court Won't Take On Mine Coverage Suit

    A divided Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the Fifth Circuit's request for guidance on the application of the Louisiana Oilfield Anti-Indemnity Act in a coverage dispute over a death at a Louisiana salt mine.

  • December 20, 2023

    Excess Policy Still Alive In Bridge Collapse Row, 8th Circ. Told

    An engineering firm has asked the Eighth Circuit to undo its decision that coverage is unavailable under a Liberty Mutual umbrella policy for an underlying action over a bridge collapse that resulted in a $2.5 million settlement, maintaining that additional questions remain and should be addressed on remand.

  • December 19, 2023

    Former Geico Agents Turn To 6th Circ. In Misclassification Suit

    A group of former Geico agents asked the Sixth Circuit to review an Ohio federal court's decision to toss their suit against the insurer, which centered on claims that they were denied benefits because they were misclassified as independent contractors.

  • December 19, 2023

    7th Circ. Got BIPA Insurance Ruling Wrong, Ill. Judges Say

    An Illinois appellate court ruled Tuesday that two insurers are not responsible for part of a $19 million settlement in underlying biometric privacy litigation based on a broad violation-of-law policy exclusion, saying the Seventh Circuit's recent analysis of nearly identical language is not "an accurate reflection of Illinois law."

Expert Analysis

  • How Law Firms Can Maximize COVID-19 Insurance Coverage

    Author Photo

    Law firms struggling due to the pandemic should identify relevant insurance policies and provisions, be mindful of notice requirements that could interfere with coverage, and push back against policy exclusions, say Robin Cohen and James Smith at McKool Smith.

  • Maximize Chances Of Insurance Coverage For COVID-19

    Author Photo

    Policyholders suffering losses related to COVID-19 can take steps right now, such as documenting proof of loss and mitigation efforts, to preserve their chances of recovery under property or business interruption insurance policies, says Creighton Page at Foley Hoag.

  • Does Property Insurance Cover COVID-19 Damage In Texas?

    Author Photo

    Business interruption claims have led the news about COVID-19 insurance disputes, but ahead could be property claims made pursuant to homeowners' policies — another proposition with significant complexity, says Drew Jones at Thompson Coe.

  • Excess Policy Win Gives Calif. Insureds Hope For The Future

    Author Photo

    The California Supreme Court's decision in Montrose v. Los Angeles Superior Court gives insureds facing long-tail liabilities a valuable gift by adopting the theory of vertical exhaustion, but it also explicitly leaves a number of questions to be resolved in future decisions, says Michael Fehner at Irell & Manella.

  • Pa. Ruling Doesn't Support COVID-19 Biz Interruption Claims

    Author Photo

    A recent Law360 guest article argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Friends of Devito v. Wolf provides a clear advantage to policyholders seeking business interruption coverage for COVID-19 losses, but the case is not even related to property damage, say Anthony Miscioscia and Timothy Carroll at White and Williams.

  • Liability Insurance Outlook For Opioid Public Nuisance Claims

    Author Photo

    As lawsuits against prescription opioid manufacturers are being narrowed to focus on public nuisance claims based on intentional business schemes, pharmaceutical companies may struggle to secure insurance coverage unless they can explain how these claims allege a fortuitous loss, say Patrick Bedell and Allyson Spacht at BatesCarey.

  • Are Litigation Funding Documents Protected From Discovery?

    Author Photo

    With law firms and their clients increasingly interested in exploring litigation funding during the current economic crisis, attorneys must be aware of the trends emerging in courts across the country regarding the discoverability of litigation funding materials, say attorneys at Jenner & Block and Longford Capital.

  • 3 Insurance Principles Behind Calif. Excess Policy Ruling

    Author Photo

    The California Supreme Court's recent decision in Montrose v. Los Angeles Superior Court, streamlining policyholders' ability to collect from multiple policies, is based on three state insurance principles specific to continuous injury, say attorneys at Reed Smith.

  • Virus Coverage Prospects Are Bright For Ind. Policyholders

    Author Photo

    Indiana’s strong history of rigorous protection for insureds and strict scrutiny of contract terms bodes well for policyholders seeking coverage for COVID-19-related losses, so they should not take denials at face value, say attorneys at Plews Shadley.

  • Pa. Ruling Strengthens Arguments For COVID Loss Coverage

    Author Photo

    This week, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court provided critical insight on the legal characterization and consequences of the COVID-19 crisis, finding policyholders’ business losses during the pandemic are indistinguishable from those caused by casualty events for which property-based insurance coverage has always been intended, says Jordan Rand at Klehr Harrison.

  • Problematic 'Unavailability' Insurance Exception Lives On

    Author Photo

    The Maryland Court of Appeals’ unfortunate decision in Rossello v. Zurich represents the second time in the last six months that a state supreme court has approved unavailability of insurance as an exception to the general rule of time-of-the-risk proration for long-tail claims, based on case law that is no longer good authority, says Michael Aylward at Morrison Mahoney.

  • COVID-19 Test Providers, Beware Kickback Enforcement Tool

    Author Photo

    Labs and providers offering COVID-19 tests should take several measures to reduce their risk of aggressive government prosecution of unlawful quid pro quos under the newly weaponized Eliminating Kickbacks in Recovery Act, says Joshua Robbins at Greenberg Gross.

  • A Call To Action For The Coming Insurance Litigation Siege

    Author Photo

    Anticipating an onslaught of insurance litigation over coronavirus business interruption claims, G. Andrew Lundberg at Burford Capital paints a picture of what cooperation could look like among lawyers, courts, legislatures, regulators, insurers and policyholders dealing with this once-in-a-generation stress on the nation's judicial resources.