IN RE: VANGUARD CHESTER FUNDS LITIGATION
Case Number:
2:22-cv-00955
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Debevoise & Plimpton
 - Dovel & Luner
 - Faegre Drinker
 - Golomb Legal
 - Kopelowitz Ostrow
 - Montgomery McCracken
 - Paul Weiss
 - Rosen Law Firm PA
 - Sidley Austin
 - Troutman
 - Welsh & Recker
 - Wolf Haldenstein
 
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
- 
						September 08, 2025
						
New $25M Vanguard Investor Tax Case Deal Gets Initial OK
A $25 million settlement of a class action accusing Vanguard of improperly triggering an asset sell-off that saddled investors with steep tax bills received preliminary approval Monday, according to an order in Pennsylvania federal court, after a $40 million deal was rejected in May.
 - 
						August 07, 2025
						
Vanguard, Investors Agree To Settle After Axed $40M Tax Deal
Vanguard and investors have reached a second deal in a suit over allegations of surprise tax bills from a fund restructuring after a Pennsylvania federal judge scrapped a previous settlement in which the class would have fetched $40 million, the parties said Thursday.
 - 
						July 02, 2025
						
Top Federal Tax Cases Of 2025: Midyear Report
In the first half of the year, the U.S. Supreme Court barred a defunct transportation company's bankruptcy trustee from clawing back federal taxes and prevented the U.S. Tax Court from reviewing a collection dispute after the IRS stopped going after the underlying debt. In Arizona, a federal judge refused to block the IRS from issuing batch denials of pandemic-era worker credit claims. Here, Law360 reviews some of the top federal court decisions from the past six months.
 - 
						June 02, 2025
						
Vanguard, Investors Renegotiating After $40M Tax Deal Axed
Vanguard and investors have scrapped a $40 million class action deal in a case over surprise tax bills from a fund restructuring and will resume settlement discussions after a Pennsylvania federal judge recently found that the deal could have saddled investors with attorney fees.
 - 
						May 19, 2025
						
Vanguard $40M Deal Rejected In Investors' Tax Fight
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Monday rejected a $40 million proposed settlement between Vanguard and investors, blocking the investors' attorneys from netting $13 million in fees and embracing the objections of one investor who called out the deal — meant to compensate for surprise tax bills — as worthless.
 - 
						March 18, 2025
						
Judge Probes Atty Conflict In Vanguard $40M Settlement
A Pennsylvania federal judge questioned whether attorneys representing investors suing Vanguard over surprise tax bills have a conflict of interest in pushing for a $40 million settlement, adding to concerns about a parallel regulatory settlement that has delayed approval of the deal.
 - 
						March 13, 2025
						
Vanguard's $40M Deal In Tax Suit Gets Delay In Final Approval
A Pennsylvania federal judge delayed a proposed $40 million settlement between Vanguard and investors who claimed the firm unfairly stuck them with big tax bills, saying both sides must respond to objections about the effects of a recent SEC settlement on the deal.
 - 
						February 18, 2025
						
Vanguard Investors Object To $40M Settlement Proposal
A handful of the investors claiming Vanguard breached its fiduciary duty when it triggered an asset sell-off that stuck them with big tax bills objected to a proposed $40 million settlement, with some saying attorneys in the underlying class action could get too much money for making the deal.
 - 
						November 25, 2024
						
Vanguard, Investors Get Initial OK On $40M Deal In Tax Suit
A Pennsylvania federal judge gave initial approval Monday to a $40 million settlement between Vanguard and investors who claimed the firm breached its fiduciary duty when it triggered a sell-off of assets that left investors with hefty tax bills.
 - 
						November 07, 2024
						
Vanguard Investors Ink $40M Settlement In Tax Liability Suit
Vanguard investors have asked a Pennsylvania federal judge to give the first green light to a $40 million settlement reached with the firm over it allegedly breaching its fiduciary duty when it triggered a sell-off of assets that left investors with massive tax bills.