United States, et al. v. Google LLC

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:23-cv-00108

Court:

Virginia Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Judge:

Leonie M. Brinkema

Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 01, 2024

    Retail Cases To Watch In 2024

    A wide variety of cases are likely to keep retail industry attorneys busy in 2024, including high-profile antitrust actions against Amazon and Google, a growing number of greenwashing disputes, and skirmishes between major retailers and their increasingly unionized workforces.

  2. October 16, 2023

    Google Ad Tech Judge Explains Refusal To DQ Paul Weiss

    A Virginia federal judge on Monday explained why she opted not to disqualify Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP from its role spearheading Google's defense in the U.S. Department of Justice's ad tech monopolization case, ruling that there's no conflict of interest presented by its former representation of Yelp and a newspaper trade group in an unrelated antitrust matter.

  3. October 13, 2023

    Google Ad Tech Judge Won't DQ Paul Weiss For Repping Yelp

    A Virginia federal judge on Friday refused to disqualify Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP from its lead role representing Google in the Justice Department's ad tech monopolization case, rejecting conflict of interest concerns raised by Yelp and a newspaper trade group as previous firm clients.

  4. October 10, 2023

    Paul Weiss Fights Yelp's DQ Bid In Google Ad Tech Case

    Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP should be allowed to represent Google in the government's ad tech monopolization case against the tech giant because work the firm previously did for Yelp and a newspaper trade group doesn't create any real conflict, the firm has told a Virginia federal court.

  5. September 25, 2023

    Yelp, Newspapers Want Paul Weiss DQ In Google AdTech Row

    Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP shouldn't be able to defend Google in the government's ad tech monopolization case against it, Yelp and a newspaper trade group have said, arguing that they already hired the firm to provide advice concerning investigations into the internet giant.

  6. September 18, 2023

    Google Ad Tech Judge Explains Why Bias Defense Must Go

    The Virginia federal judge overseeing the U.S. Department of Justice's ad tech monopolization case against Google released a written opinion on Monday detailing her decision to grant the federal government's bid to nix the tech giant's bias prosecution defense, saying Google hasn't presented adequate evidence of government bias.

  7. September 15, 2023

    DOJ Gets Google's Bias Defense Cut In Ad Tech Case

    U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on Friday granted the Justice Department's bid to nix Google's bias prosecution defense in the ad tech monopolization case, but the judge also raised questions about future involvement in the case by the agency's top antitrust official.

  8. September 11, 2023

    DOJ Says Google Millions Of Documents Behind In Discovery

    The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a Virginia federal judge for a partial do-over on the process governing discovery in an antitrust suit over Google's control of the technology powering online advertising auctions, necessitated, the DOJ said, by the company's failure to produce millions of documents on time.

  9. August 25, 2023

    Ad Tech Judge 'At A Loss' Why Google Needs Feds' Comms

    A Virginia federal magistrate judge expressed skepticism Friday that Google really needs U.S. Department of Justice communications with federal agencies the DOJ says are privileged, telling the parties during a hearing that there are other ways to undercut an antitrust suit over Google's control of the technology powering online advertising auctions.

  10. August 24, 2023

    DOJ Fights Google Discovery Bids In Ad Tech 'Rocket Docket'

    The U.S. Department of Justice has pushed back against a pair of discovery requests filed by Google in fast-moving Virginia federal court litigation over alleged violations of antitrust law involving the company's digital advertising technology.