Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al.
Case Number:
25-250
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 24, 2025
Former Judges Tell Justices To Strike Down Trump's Tariffs
Former federal judges and government officials, joined by scholars, economists, businesses and interest groups, told the U.S. Supreme Court this week that President Donald Trump's emergency tariffs should be struck down because the law the president has utilized does not give him power to impose those measures.
-
October 14, 2025
High Court Says Blackfeet Members Can't Join Tariff Dispute
The U.S. Supreme Court denied a bid by members of the Blackfeet Nation to join its review of suits challenging the legality of President Donald Trump's emergency tariffs, who had argued that their inclusion in the dispute is crucial to protect Indigenous rights under federal law.
-
October 03, 2025
4 Top Supreme Court Cases To Watch This Term
After a busy summer of emergency rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court will kick off its October 2025 term Monday with only a few big-ticket cases on its docket — over presidential authorities, transgender athletes and election law — in what might be a strategically slow start to a potentially momentous term. Here, Law360 looks at four of the most important cases on the court's docket so far.
-
September 09, 2025
Justices Grant Fast-Track Review For Trump Tariff Suit
The U.S. Supreme Court will fast-track its consideration of the government's appeal of a Federal Circuit ruling that President Donald Trump's tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are unlawful, according to a Tuesday order.
-
September 09, 2025
States Urge Justices To Quickly Rule Against Trump's Tariffs
The U.S. Supreme Court should quickly consider the appeal of the Federal Circuit's ruling that President Donald Trump's emergency tariffs are unlawful and affirm that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act doesn't provide the authority to impose duties, the states challenging the measures told the justices this week.