Winston R. Anderson, et al., Petitioners v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al.
Case Number:
25-498
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Davis & Harman
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Gupta Wessler
- Kellogg Hansen
- Morgan Lewis
- Ropes & Gray
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
- AARP Inc.
- American Association for Justice
- American Benefits Council
- Intel Corp.
- Investment Company Institute
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 12, 2026
JAMS Chief Executive Says Mass Arbitrations On The Rise
Mediation giant JAMS says it has seen a major upswing in mass arbitrations in employment and other contexts, as plaintiff-side firms develop new ways of responding to language requiring out-of-court dispute resolution by companies. CEO Kimberly Taylor and veteran JAMS mediator Robert Meyer spoke to Law360 about mediation trends, with a specific focus on employee benefits disputes.
-
May 26, 2026
Justices Won't Take Suit Against Teamsters Fund Overseers
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down a Teamsters retiree's bid for review of the dismissal of his proposed class action alleging that union multiemployer plan trustees and advisers allowed risky investments and hefty plan management fees, leaving in place a Second Circuit decision from November.
-
May 05, 2026
Worker Fights 2nd Circ.'s Toss Of Teamsters Fund ERISA Suit
The U.S. Supreme Court should revive claims that the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund was mismanaged, a Teamsters-represented worker argued, asking the justices to breathe new life into his twice-dismissed Employee Retirement Income Security Act lawsuit.
-
April 28, 2026
AARP, Others Back Intel Workers In High Court 401(k) Fight
AARP and other retirement and investor advocates are supporting former Intel employees who allege their employee 401(k) savings were dragged down by underperforming investments, telling the U.S. Supreme Court the Ninth Circuit erred in requiring the plaintiffs to identify a "meaningful benchmark" for comparison to their lagging funds.
-
April 24, 2026
Ex-Intel Workers Urge Justices To Revive 401(k) Fund Suit
Former Intel employees urged the U.S. Supreme Court to revive their suit alleging their employee 401(k) savings were dragged down by underperforming investments, arguing the Ninth Circuit's requirement that allegations of subpar funds also include a meaningful benchmark for comparison didn't align with federal benefits law.
-
April 09, 2026
Cigna 401(k) Suit Won't Wait For Intel Supreme Court Decision
A Pennsylvania federal court turned down Cigna's bid to stay a proposed class action alleging the insurance company misspent forfeitures from its employee 401(k) plan and offered an underperforming investment fund while the U.S. Supreme Court considers a 401(k) suit against Intel, finding the request unjustified.
-
March 18, 2026
Coke Bottler 401(k) Suit Put On Ice For High Court Ruling
A Coca-Cola bottler can't dodge a proposed class action claiming its 401(k) plan was loaded with lackluster options, a Texas federal judge ruled, saying the company's dismissal bid must wait until the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in on the standards for claims of retirement investment underperformance.
-
February 11, 2026
Intel 401(k) Suit Arguments Pushed To Next High Court Term
The U.S. Supreme Court will wait until next term to hear arguments in an appeal from Intel ex-workers seeking to revive proposed class allegations that their 401(k) retirement savings were dragged down by underperforming target-date funds, a delay confirmed by justices' April calendar posted on Wednesday.
-
January 27, 2026
11th Circ. Scrutinizes Royal Caribbean's Defeat Of 401(k) Suit
The Eleventh Circuit zeroed in Tuesday on whether a lower court had enough evidence to hand Royal Caribbean a pretrial win in a suit brought by cruise ship workers who alleged they lost 401(k) savings because of shoddy target-date investment funds.
-
January 23, 2026
Intel Case Sets Up Justices To Tackle 401(k) Benchmarks
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to take up a suit challenging target-date fund offerings in two Intel employee 401(k) plans gives benefits attorneys hope that clarity is coming on whether meaningful benchmarks are required to plead that investment underperformance breached fiduciary duties under federal benefits law.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →