IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number:
0:18-cv-01776
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Gustafson Gluek
- Bailey & Glasser
- Forsgren Fisher
- Larson King
- Wiley Rein
- Hagens Berman
- Freed Kanner
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- Felhaber Larson
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Honigman LLP
- Covington & Burling
- Hogan Lovells
- Baker Botts
- Ahern and Associates
- Gibbs & Bruns
- Spencer Fane
- Tostrud Law Group
- Siegel Brill
- Paul LLP
- Kaplan Fox
- Law Office of Thomas J. Nolan
- Lathrop GPM
- Chestnut Cambronne
- Winthrop & Weinstine
- Meagher & Geer
- Jones Day
- Maynard Nexsen
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Foley & Lardner
- Seeger Weiss
- Garwin Gerstein
- Lockridge Grindal
- Boies Schiller
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Manning Law Firm
- Anthony Ostlund
- NastLaw
- Clifford Chance
- Coffman Law Firm
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Axinn Veltrop
- Edelson Lechtzin
- Bowman & Brooke
- Barrett Law Group
- Hausfeld LLP
- Carlton Fields
- Bourelly George
- Spector Roseman
- Greenspoon Marder
- Sawyer & Labar
- Thompson Tarasek
- FeganScott
- Wexler Boley
- Stinson LLP
- Polsinelli PC
- Gibson Dunn
- Pearson Warshaw
- Sherrard Roe
- Stearns Weaver
- Taft Stettinius
- Marcus & Shapira
- Quinn Emanuel
- Husch Blackwell
- Faegre Drinker
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Kellogg Hansen
- Robins Kaplan
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Schneider Wallace
- Strauss Borrelli
- Gordon Rees
- Meshbesher & Spence
- Larkin Hoffman
- Bilzin Sumberg
- Heins Mills
- BrownWinick
- Pavich Law Group
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Greene Espel
- Keibler Law Group
- Taus Cebulash
- Dykema
- Sperling Kenny
- Zimmerman Reed
- Brown Fox PLLC
- Hart McLaughlin
- Donna Law Firm
- Fine Kaplan
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost
- Mayer Brown
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- Agri Stats Inc.
- Albertsons Cos. Inc.
- Nestle Purina PetCare Co.
- Aramark
- Publix Super Markets Inc.
- CKE Restaurants Inc.
- Hy-Vee
- Giant Eagle Inc.
- Triumph Foods LLC
- Shamrock Foods Co.
- Indiana Packers Corp.
- Compass Group PLC
- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc.
- Wawa Inc.
- Save Mart Supermarkets
- Nestle SA
- Conagra Brands Inc.
- Maximum Quality Foods
- The Kraft Heinz Co.
- McDonald's Corp.
- The Golub Corp.
- McLane Co. Inc.
- Certco Inc.
- Bi-Lo
- Ferraro Foods Inc.
- Topco Associates LLC
- Brookshire Grocery
- BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc.
- Target Corp.
- Wakefern Food Corp.
- Seaboard Corp.
- Cheney Brothers Inc.
- Buffalo Wild Wings Inc.
- Supervalu Inc.
- Gordon Food Service Inc.
- Sodexo SA
- URM Stores Inc.
- Clemens Food Group LLC
- Tyson Foods Inc.
- Sysco Corp.
- Aldi GmbH & Co. KG
- Jimmy John's Franchise LLC
- Smithfield Foods Inc.
- Mitsubishi Corp.
- Compass Minerals International, Inc.
- Hormel Foods Corp.
- Domino's Pizza Inc.
- Sherwood Food Distributors LLC
- Unified Grocers Inc.
- United Natural Foods Inc.
- The Kroger Co.
- JBS USA Holdings Inc.
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
- Dollar General Corp.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 23, 2025
Triumph Tries Again To Dump Pork Price-Fixing Claims
Triumph Foods urged a Minnesota federal court to reconsider throwing out claims against it concerning alleged price-fixing in the pork industry, saying it shouldn't be held responsible for the alleged actions of hog farmers and the company that sells the pork it processes.
-
October 07, 2025
Price-Fixing Judge Rejects Recusal Bid As Insincere
A Minnesota federal judge on Tuesday refused to recuse himself from consolidated private price-fixing litigation against a raft of pork producers, saying the defense's claims of bias due to one of his clerks' internships for plaintiff firms are a "fabricated" claim of impropriety.
-
October 01, 2025
Tyson Inks $85M Deal To Exit Consumers' Pork Antitrust Suit
Pork consumers asked a Minnesota federal court Wednesday to greenlight an $85 million settlement resolving their claims against Tyson Foods Inc. in major antitrust litigation alleging pork producers conspired with data firm Agri Stats Inc. to inflate pork prices by limiting the supply in the U.S. market.
-
June 10, 2025
Clerk's Role Means Antitrust Judge Must Recuse, Court Told
Pork producer defendants involved in a major pork price-fixing case continue to push for the recusal of a Minnesota federal judge because of his clerk's connections to plaintiff-side firms, arguing the plaintiffs are running from "indisputable facts."
-
May 19, 2025
Cos. Fight Recusal Bid In Antitrust Case Over Clerk Ties
The Minnesota federal judge overseeing a major pork price-fixing case shouldn't have to recuse himself just because one of his clerks worked at plaintiffs-side firms, pork purchaser plaintiffs say, calling the defendants' request a cynical ploy that comes on the eve of trial.
-
April 29, 2025
Pork Producers Want Ruling Tossed Over Clerk's Conduct
Pork producers and Agri Stats Inc., which are defending themselves against a major price-fixing suit, are calling on the Minnesota federal judge overseeing the case to recuse himself and vacate his recent rulings, accusing one of his clerks of having inappropriate relationships with plaintiffs' attorneys in a new filing this week.
-
April 01, 2025
Pork Price-Fixing Fight Over Sales Data Swap Heads To Trial
A Minnesota federal court mostly denied Monday a slew of summary judgment motions from Tyson and other pork producers seeking wins in an antitrust suit alleging they conspired with data firm Agri Stats to fix pork prices and reduce supply, teeing up the high-stakes multidistrict litigation for a June trial.
-
March 26, 2025
Sysco Can't Tap Out Of $50M Price-Fix Deal With JBS
Sysco can't back out of a $50 million agreement it made with JBS for the meat producer to exit sprawling litigation accusing it of working to fix the price of poultry, beef and pork, even though Sysco has since signed away its interest in the antitrust claims, a federal court has ruled.
-
October 23, 2024
DOJ Bolsters Defense In Pork Price-Fixing Case, Cos. Say
Hormel, Tyson, JBS and other pork producers told a Minnesota federal court that a Justice Department intervention into a private price-fixing litigation actually backs their defense, even though the government took no position on the merits of the case.
-
October 02, 2024
DOJ Says Info Sharing Alone Can Violate Law In Pork Case
The U.S. Department of Justice told the court overseeing a case accusing major pork producers of colluding to raise prices the exchange of competitively sensitive information, even in aggregated form, can violate the antitrust laws.