IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case Number:
0:18-cv-01776
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Gustafson Gluek
- Bailey & Glasser
- Forsgren Fisher
- Larson King
- Wiley Rein
- Hagens Berman
- Freed Kanner
- Saltz Mongeluzzi
- Felhaber Larson
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Honigman LLP
- Covington & Burling
- Hogan Lovells
- Baker Botts
- Ahern and Associates
- Gibbs & Bruns
- Spencer Fane
- Tostrud Law Group
- Siegel Brill
- Paul LLP
- Kaplan Fox
- Law Office of Thomas J. Nolan
- Lathrop GPM
- Chestnut Cambronne
- Winthrop & Weinstine
- Meagher & Geer
- Jones Day
- Maynard Nexsen
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Foley & Lardner
- Seeger Weiss
- Garwin Gerstein
- Lockridge Grindal
- Boies Schiller
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Manning Law Firm
- Anthony Ostlund
- NastLaw
- Clifford Chance
- Coffman Law Firm
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Axinn Veltrop
- Edelson Lechtzin
- Bowman & Brooke
- Barrett Law Group
- Hausfeld LLP
- Carlton Fields
- Bourelly George
- Spector Roseman
- Greenspoon Marder
- Sawyer & Labar
- Thompson Tarasek
- FeganScott
- Wexler Boley
- Stinson LLP
- Polsinelli PC
- Gibson Dunn
- Pearson Warshaw
- Sherrard Roe
- Stearns Weaver
- Taft Stettinius
- Marcus & Shapira
- Quinn Emanuel
- Husch Blackwell
- Faegre Drinker
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Kellogg Hansen
- Robins Kaplan
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Schneider Wallace
- Strauss Borrelli
- Gordon Rees
- Meshbesher & Spence
- Larkin Hoffman
- Bilzin Sumberg
- Heins Mills
- BrownWinick
- Pavich Law Group
- Wolf Haldenstein
- Greene Espel
- Keibler Law Group
- Taus Cebulash
- Dykema
- Sperling Kenny
- Zimmerman Reed
- Brown Fox PLLC
- Hart McLaughlin
- Donna Law Firm
- Fine Kaplan
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost
- Mayer Brown
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- Agri Stats Inc.
- Albertsons Cos. Inc.
- Nestle Purina PetCare Co.
- Aramark
- Publix Super Markets Inc.
- CKE Restaurants Inc.
- Hy-Vee
- Giant Eagle Inc.
- Triumph Foods LLC
- Shamrock Foods Co.
- Indiana Packers Corp.
- Compass Group PLC
- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc.
- Wawa Inc.
- Save Mart Supermarkets
- Nestle SA
- Conagra Brands Inc.
- Maximum Quality Foods
- The Kraft Heinz Co.
- McDonald's Corp.
- The Golub Corp.
- McLane Co. Inc.
- Certco Inc.
- Bi-Lo
- Ferraro Foods Inc.
- Topco Associates LLC
- Brookshire Grocery
- BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc.
- Target Corp.
- Wakefern Food Corp.
- Seaboard Corp.
- Cheney Brothers Inc.
- Buffalo Wild Wings Inc.
- Supervalu Inc.
- Gordon Food Service Inc.
- Sodexo SA
- URM Stores Inc.
- Clemens Food Group LLC
- Tyson Foods Inc.
- Sysco Corp.
- Aldi GmbH & Co. KG
- Jimmy John's Franchise LLC
- Smithfield Foods Inc.
- Mitsubishi Corp.
- Compass Minerals International, Inc.
- Hormel Foods Corp.
- Domino's Pizza Inc.
- Sherwood Food Distributors LLC
- Unified Grocers Inc.
- United Natural Foods Inc.
- The Kroger Co.
- JBS USA Holdings Inc.
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
- Dollar General Corp.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 30, 2021
$83M Deal Chops Smithfield From Direct Buyers' Pork Suit
Smithfield Foods has reached a tentative $83 million settlement to resolve antitrust claims in Minnesota federal court from direct buyers that accuse giants in the meat industry of scheming to inflate pork prices, the company said.
-
April 16, 2021
JBS Offers Eateries $13M In New 'Ice-Breaker' Pork Settlement
JBS USA Food Co. has settled with more plaintiffs in litigation accusing meat-processing giants of scheming to inflate pork prices, with commercial and institutional indirect buyers asking a Minnesota federal judge to preliminarily greenlight a $12.75 million deal.
-
March 29, 2021
JBS Forks Over $20M To Consumers In Pork Price-Fix Suit
JBS has agreed to a $20 million deal with consumer indirect purchasers who claim in Minnesota federal court that the meat-processing giant schemed with other companies to inflate pork prices.
-
March 05, 2021
Pork Buyers Get Steering Committee In Antitrust Suit
A Minnesota federal magistrate judge summarily agreed Friday to establish a plaintiff's steering committee for indirect pork buyers accusing Smithfield, Tyson and other major pork producers of a conspiracy to inflate prices.
-
February 24, 2021
Pork Buyers Want Steering Committee In Antitrust Suit
A class of indirect pork buyers on Tuesday asked a Minnesota federal judge to establish a plaintiff's steering committee in antitrust litigation accusing Smithfield, Tyson and other major pork producers of a conspiracy to inflate prices, pointing to four law firms to help interim co-lead counsel for the buyers organize their efforts.
-
January 14, 2021
Pork Buyers Win Initial Approval Of $24.5M Deal With JBS
Direct buyers of pork won preliminary approval of a $24.5 million settlement with JBS to resolve price-fixing allegations, as a Minnesota federal judge gave the first nod to a deal that would also obligate the meat processing giant to cooperate with the plaintiffs.
-
December 01, 2020
Pork Buyers Seek Initial Approval Of $24.5M JBS Settlement
Direct buyers moved for preliminary approval on Tuesday of a $24.5 million deal with JBS USA Food Co. that also comes with a company pledge to provide "material cooperation" to the plaintiffs, in what is the first settlement in a massive Minnesota federal court case accusing pork producers of conspiring to raise prices.
-
November 04, 2020
JBS, Direct Buyers Announce Settlement In Pork Antitrust Suit
A pork processor accused of conspiring with others, including Tyson and Hormel, to raise the price of pork by reducing supply has reached a settlement deal with a class of buyers, according to a Wednesday filing in Minnesota federal court.
-
May 13, 2020
Pork Processors Push Bid To Duck Antitrust Suit
Pork processors including Tyson and Hormel urged a Minnesota federal court during a Wednesday hearing to toss allegations that they conspired to raise the price of pork by reducing supply, saying the buyers haven't shown the processors acted in parallel.
-
May 12, 2020
Pork Buyers Say 'Essential' Tag Bolsters Their Antitrust Case
Pork buyers suing Smithfield, Tyson and other major producers over an alleged conspiracy to inflate prices have told a Minnesota federal court that a White House executive order meant to ensure that meatpackers continue operating during the coronavirus pandemic shows the producers can hike prices by reducing output.