November 26, 2024
Aprahamian v. Bihari et al
Case Number:
7:24-cv-09045
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Caitlin Robin & Associates
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Hogan Lovells
- Kasowitz LLP
- Proskauer Rose
- Walden Macht
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
January 29, 2026
Sandoz, Teva Beat Malicious Prosecution Claims, For Now
Sandoz and Teva have won a reprieve from a former pharmaceutical marketing executive claiming the drugmakers and their officers offered him up to federal prosecutors with fabricated assertions of price-fixing, with a New York federal judge concluding the suit "does not come close" to the standard for malicious prosecution.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login