In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:21-md-02981
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Altair Law
- Bartlit Beck
- Gustafson Gluek
- Tostrud Law Group
- Kellogg Hansen
- Milberg Coleman
- Winston & Strawn
- DiCello Levitt
- Kaplan Fox
- Forman Watkins
- Stradling Yocca
- Venable LLP
- Morgan Lewis
- A&O Shearman
- Gibson Dunn
- Williams & Connolly
- Paul Hastings
- Munger Tolles
- Paul Weiss
- Faegre Drinker
- Zelle LLP
- Pritzker Levine
- Hagens Berman
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Wilson Sonsini
- Hueston Hennigan
- Tyz Law Group
- Scott&Scott
- Barrett Law Group
- Hausfeld LLP
- Schonbrun Seplow
- Hadsell Stormer
- Benedict Law Group
- Korein Tillery
- Fox Rothschild
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Kwun Bhansali
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Sidley Austin
- Ellis George
- Hogan Lovells
- Covington & Burling
- Berger Montague
- Cravath Swaine
- Willkie Farr
- Foley & Lardner
- Quinn Emanuel
- Frederick M. Lehrer Attorney at Law
- Mantese Honigman
- Keller Rohrback
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- McManis Faulkner
- Cotchett Pitre
- Miller Barondess
- Dechert LLP
- Annaguey McCann
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Sperling Kenny
- Kirby McInerney
- Saveri & Saveri
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- Hulu LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Netflix Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Epic Games Inc.
- TikTok Inc.
- Riot Games Inc.
- Sony Group Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Google LLC
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Bumble Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Big Fish Games Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Activision Blizzard Inc.
- Alphabet Inc.
- Electronic Arts Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- The Walt Disney Co.
Government Agencies
- State of Nevada
- State of Indiana
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Tennessee
- State of Michigan
- Federal Trade Commission
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 22, 2026
Google, Epic Fight Uphill To Tweak App Antitrust Injunction
A California federal judge indicated Thursday that he's unlikely to grant Epic and Google's request to modify a permanent injunction issued after a jury found Google monopolized the distribution of apps on Android devices, saying they have to show changed circumstances, and "I haven't seen anything change, other than a deal" between the companies.
-
January 22, 2026
FTC Cites 'Serious Concerns' With Epic-Google Play Deal
A settlement resolving Epic Games' antitrust lawsuit against Google that would replace the injunction Epic won against Google's Play Store controls has drawn pushback from the Federal Trade Commission, which is urging strict scrutiny of the agreement currently under the eye of an already skeptical California federal judge.
-
January 20, 2026
Microsoft Warns Google Play Store Deal Invites Antitrust Harm
Microsoft Corp. urged a California federal judge to reject the proposed Android app distribution settlement in Epic Games' antitrust suit against Google, arguing that the deal would essentially erase the court's injunction requiring Google to open up its Play Store to Microsoft and other competitors.
-
January 15, 2026
Epic CEO, Google Execs To Testify At Play Store Deal Hearing
Epic Games and Google plan to call Epic CEO Tim Sweeney, an economist, a Google executive and in-house counsel during an upcoming evidentiary hearing into their proposed Android app distribution settlement, which has drawn skepticism from the judge, who has appointed an economist to independently evaluate the deal.
-
December 03, 2025
Google Wants Justices To Pause Petition Pending Epic Deal
Google asked the U.S. Supreme Court to put its petition seeking review of the antitrust case from Epic Games over the distribution of apps on Android devices on hold while the district court considers a potential settlement.
-
November 06, 2025
Google-Epic Judge Raises Doubts About App Antitrust Deal
The California federal judge overseeing Epic Games' antitrust suit against Google expressed serious doubts Thursday about their recent deal to end their fight over Android app distribution, ordering an evidentiary hearing and warning he's not sure the proposed deal will correct Google's illegal conduct.
-
September 15, 2025
Google Consumers' Attys Seek $85M In Fees For $700M Deal
Attorneys who helped consumers reach a still-pending $700 million antitrust deal with Google in 2023 have urged a California federal judge to grant them $85 million in attorney fees, saying the settlement, reached alongside state attorneys general, was an "exceptional" result obtained in the "face of substantial litigation uncertainty."
-
August 25, 2025
Epic Says Google Ought To Pay Up For Play Store Fight
While Google is busy appealing a ruling mandating that it open up its Play store, Epic Games isn't waiting to ask a California federal judge to order the technology titan to pay the $180 million in legal bills it racked up over the course of the five-year court battle.
-
November 27, 2024
Google Wants 9th Circ. To Undo Play Store Ruling In Epic Row
Google has pressed the Ninth Circuit to reverse an injunction forcing it to allow third-party app distribution on its Play Store, arguing that the lower court's ruling will "directly undercut Google's efforts to compete against Apple and the iPhone."
-
November 14, 2024
'The World Has Changed': Google's $700M Deal Gets 2nd Look
The California federal judge considering Google's $700 million antitrust deal with states and consumers told plaintiffs' counsel Thursday to review the settlement terms to ensure that they comport with Google Play store changes he ordered in Epic Games' separate lawsuit, saying "the world has changed" since they struck the deal.