In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:21-md-02981
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Altair Law
- Bartlit Beck
- Gustafson Gluek
- Tostrud Law Group
- Kellogg Hansen
- Milberg Coleman
- Winston & Strawn
- DiCello Levitt
- Kaplan Fox
- Forman Watkins
- Stradling Yocca
- Venable LLP
- Morgan Lewis
- A&O Shearman
- Gibson Dunn
- Williams & Connolly
- Paul Hastings
- Munger Tolles
- Paul Weiss
- Faegre Drinker
- Zelle LLP
- Pritzker Levine
- Hagens Berman
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Wilson Sonsini
- Hueston Hennigan
- Tyz Law Group
- Scott&Scott
- Barrett Law Group
- Hausfeld LLP
- Schonbrun Seplow
- Hadsell Stormer
- Benedict Law Group
- Korein Tillery
- Fox Rothschild
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Kwun Bhansali
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Sidley Austin
- Ellis George
- Hogan Lovells
- Covington & Burling
- Berger Montague
- Cravath Swaine
- Willkie Farr
- Foley & Lardner
- Quinn Emanuel
- Frederick M. Lehrer Attorney at Law
- Mantese Honigman
- Keller Rohrback
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- McManis Faulkner
- Cotchett Pitre
- Miller Barondess
- Dechert LLP
- Annaguey McCann
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Sperling Kenny
- Kirby McInerney
- Saveri & Saveri
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- Hulu LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Netflix Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Epic Games Inc.
- TikTok Inc.
- Riot Games Inc.
- Sony Group Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Google LLC
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Bumble Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Big Fish Games Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Activision Blizzard Inc.
- Alphabet Inc.
- Electronic Arts Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- The Walt Disney Co.
Government Agencies
- State of Nevada
- State of Indiana
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Tennessee
- State of Michigan
- Federal Trade Commission
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 30, 2023
Google Has Deliberately Deleted Chats For Years, Court Told
State-level enforcers and others suing Google for monopolization over its Play Store policies told a California federal court that the tech giant has been deliberately deleting internal company chats for years and is asking for a slap on the wrist as punishment for destroying evidence.
-
January 25, 2023
Google Says Its Doc Retention Sours Play Store Sanctions Bid
Google has hit back against a motion for sanctions claiming that it failed to preserve significant evidence from its employees' online chats in a case accusing it of unlawfully monopolizing the Android app distribution and in-app payment market, stating that it has taken "multiple steps" to preserve "potentially relevant information."
-
January 12, 2023
Google Can't 'Get Away' With Deleting Chats, Judge Says
A California federal judge on Thursday criticized Google after learning the tech giant may not have preserved evidence from its employees' online chats in a case accusing the company of violating antitrust law, saying if true, "I'm not going to let Google get away with this" without a "substantial, trial-related penalty."
-
January 02, 2023
Antitrust Conduct Issues And Cases To Watch In 2023
The Federal Trade Commission prepares to test the limits of its authority to combat unfair methods of competition in the coming year, as the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcers continue pushing aggressive antitrust agendas alongside new proposed class actions from private parties.
-
November 28, 2022
Google Play Antitrust Judge Certifies 21M Consumer Class
A California federal judge on Monday certified a class of more than 21 million consumers in the multidistrict litigation accusing Google of monopolizing the market for distributing apps on Android devices and refused to exclude their economic harm expert, finding that Google's "blunderbuss" of objections "miss the mark."
-
November 18, 2022
Hearing Set For Sanctions Bid In Google Play Store Case
The California federal court overseeing antitrust litigation over Google's Play Store policies has called for an evidentiary hearing in January on a bid to sanction the tech giant for automatically deleting internal employee chats.
-
November 15, 2022
Sanctions Bid Pushed In Google Play Antitrust Case
State attorneys general and others targeting Google's Play Store dominance have reupped their bid for sanctions in litigation against the tech giant, arguing that Google's reasoning for automatically deleting internal employee chats does not "remotely pass muster."
-
November 04, 2022
Google Fights Sanctions Bid In Play Store Case
Google told a California federal court it has done enough to preserve employee chats and should not be sanctioned in a case from state attorneys general and others alleging the tech giant's Play Store policies violate antitrust law.
-
October 28, 2022
Off Beat: Scoldings, Supreme Court & More For IP Attorneys
While tracking cases related to their own practice, intellectual property attorneys may not have seen that, elsewhere in law, judges have cracked down on attorneys acting poorly, a new justice heard her first oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court and satirical news site The Onion made a plea to the high court in support of parody. Here, Law360 breaks down why seemingly irrelevant developments are worth your time.
-
October 24, 2022
Google Says Epic, Match Want To Transform Play Store Suits
Google is pushing back against a bid by Epic Games and Match Group to add claims to their Play Store antitrust suits, saying the developers are trying to introduce a new theory based on allegations already included in the case.