In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:21-md-02981
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Altair Law
- Bartlit Beck
- Gustafson Gluek
- Tostrud Law Group
- Kellogg Hansen
- Milberg Coleman
- Winston & Strawn
- DiCello Levitt
- Kaplan Fox
- Forman Watkins
- Stradling Yocca
- Venable LLP
- Morgan Lewis
- A&O Shearman
- Gibson Dunn
- Williams & Connolly
- Paul Hastings
- Munger Tolles
- Paul Weiss
- Faegre Drinker
- Zelle LLP
- Pritzker Levine
- Hagens Berman
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Wilson Sonsini
- Hueston Hennigan
- Tyz Law Group
- Scott&Scott
- Barrett Law Group
- Hausfeld LLP
- Schonbrun Seplow
- Hadsell Stormer
- Benedict Law Group
- Korein Tillery
- Fox Rothschild
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Kwun Bhansali
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Sidley Austin
- Ellis George
- Hogan Lovells
- Covington & Burling
- Berger Montague
- Cravath Swaine
- Willkie Farr
- Foley & Lardner
- Quinn Emanuel
- Frederick M. Lehrer Attorney at Law
- Mantese Honigman
- Keller Rohrback
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- McManis Faulkner
- Cotchett Pitre
- Miller Barondess
- Dechert LLP
- Annaguey McCann
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Sperling Kenny
- Kirby McInerney
- Saveri & Saveri
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- Hulu LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Netflix Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Epic Games Inc.
- TikTok Inc.
- Riot Games Inc.
- Sony Group Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Google LLC
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Bumble Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Big Fish Games Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Activision Blizzard Inc.
- Alphabet Inc.
- Electronic Arts Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- The Walt Disney Co.
Government Agencies
- State of Nevada
- State of Indiana
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Tennessee
- State of Michigan
- Federal Trade Commission
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 13, 2024
Google Calls DOJ's 'Fake Privilege' Docs Citation 'Misleading'
The D.C. federal judge weighing the fate of Google's search business should pay no heed to discussions, cited by the Justice Department, from company lawyers in a separate case of "fake privilege" hiding otherwise discoverable evidence, Google has said.
-
February 29, 2024
Epic, Google Are At App Store Antitrust Remedies 'Impasse'
Epic Games Inc. and Google LLC told a California federal judge on Wednesday that they are at an impasse over the potential changes Google will have to make following the Fortnite game developer's jury trial win on antitrust claims related to Google Play Store and Android apps.
-
February 28, 2024
Google Attys' 'Fake Privilege' Comments Cited In Search Suit
The U.S. Justice Department and states accusing Google of monopolizing the online-search market have asked a D.C. federal judge to consider internal chats disclosed in Epic Games' antitrust lawsuit that revealed Google's lawyers discussing "fake privilege" — a practice of unnecessarily involving a lawyer to make an exchange confidential.
-
February 26, 2024
Google Judge Rips $700M Antitrust Deal: 'It's Not Great'
A California federal judge lambasted a $700 million deal that consumers and state attorneys general struck with Google blocking antitrust claims related to Android apps and the Play Store for 127 million consumers for the next seven years, saying Monday he's "never granted prospective relief" and that plaintiffs "folded" with "four aces."
-
February 02, 2024
Google Looks To Nix Epic's Play Store Win
Google told a California federal court it should toss out a jury verdict in favor of Epic Games in its antitrust case over Android apps, saying the jury received improper instructions and also relied on a flawed view of the market that ignores competition from Apple.
-
January 18, 2024
Google Judge Promises 'Hot Tub' After Epic's Antitrust Win
The California federal judge who will determine what relief Epic Games gets after its antitrust jury trial win over Google's Android app market told the parties on Thursday that he'll arrange a "hot tub" hearing with economists to discuss a possible injunction, while warning Epic he won't "micromanage" Google.
-
January 11, 2024
Google App Devs' Attys Get $26M Despite Initial Skepticism
A California federal judge on Thursday gave his final approval to a $90 million deal resolving smaller developer's allegations that Google's Play Store policies violated antitrust law, awarding the developers' attorneys $26 million after initially remarking that the case "settled fast" and questioning the requested fee.
-
January 01, 2024
Retail Cases To Watch In 2024
A wide variety of cases are likely to keep retail industry attorneys busy in 2024, including high-profile antitrust actions against Amazon and Google, a growing number of greenwashing disputes, and skirmishes between major retailers and their increasingly unionized workforces.
-
December 19, 2023
Google Must Add Play Store Options In $700M Deal With AGs
State attorneys general set a $700 million price on their deal resolving antitrust claims over Google LLC's control over the Play Store for Android apps on Tuesday, under a previously announced settlement that also requires the tech giant to permit alternative billing options that can circumvent its up-to-30% commissions.
-
December 12, 2023
How Epic's Google Win Could Ripple Across Antitrust Law
Epic Games scored a major victory Monday in its crusade to force Google to open its app market to more competition, but experts say the jury verdict could also have implications for other antitrust cases targeting large technology companies.