September 14, 2011
JOHNSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-05782
Court:
Nature of Suit:
P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Judge:
Firms
- Archer & Greiner
- Arnold & Porter
- Cohen Dowd
- Coppersmith Brockelman
- Croke Fairchild
- Eckert Seamans
- Fenwick & West
- Hagens Berman
- Hangley Aronchick
- Hansen Reynolds
- Lanier Law Firm
- McCarter & English
- Mike Scott Law
- Phillips Lytle
- Pietragallo Gordon
- Reed Smith
- Saxton & Stump
- Shook Hardy
- Sidley Austin
- Spector Roseman
- Tucker Disability Law
- Tucker Law Group
- Welsh & Recker
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
February 04, 2026
Drugmakers Say Hagens Berman Responsible For Costs
Drugmakers including GSK and Sanofi have told a Pennsylvania federal court that plaintiffs firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP should bear the costs for the special master tasked with sorting out long-running disputes in a since-dropped product liability suit.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login