Your firm must have an account to access this feature

Skye Orthobiologics, LLC et al v. CTM Biomedical, LLC et al

  1. March 11, 2026

    Biomedical Co. Settles Trade Secrets Case Against Ex-Worker

    Biomedical company Skye Orthobiologics and a former employee have informed a California federal judge that they have settled a case accusing the ex-employee of breaching fiduciary duties by leveraging Skye's proprietary information.

  2. January 06, 2025

    Biotech Trade Secrets Case Gets New Punitive Damages Trial

    A California federal judge has ordered a new punitive damages trial on how much a former Skye Orthobiologics LLC employee owes in a case where he was found to have breached his fiduciary duties by leveraging Skye's proprietary information, after ruling last year there wasn't enough evidence to support an earlier $25 million award.

  3. April 19, 2024

    Judge Mulls Axing Biomedical Cos.' $25M Punitive Damages

    Not enough evidence supports Skye Orthobiologics' $25.5 million punitive damages award against an ex-employee found to have breached his fiduciary duties by leveraging Skye's proprietary information, a California federal judge has ruled, asking for briefing on whether the proper remedy is to cut the damages or grant a new trial.

  4. February 26, 2024

    Sales Reps Score $1.6M In Fees After Beating RICO Case

    A federal judge in Los Angeles has ordered a biotech startup to pay more than $1.6 million in legal fees to two former employees, after the company failed to convince a jury that the pair broke racketeering laws when they worked for a rival that stole proprietary information when setting up shop.

  5. December 08, 2023

    Biomedical Cos. Score $62M Award In Trade Secrets Trial

    A California federal judge entered judgment Thursday ordering a former Skye Orthobiologics employee to pay more than $62 million to Skye and Human Regenerative Technologies after a jury found the defendant breached his fiduciary duties and loyalty when he started a competing business using the plaintiffs' proprietary information.