IN RE: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation
Case Number:
3140
Court:
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Anapol Weiss
- Aylstock Witkin
- Beasley Allen
- Chaffin Luhana LLP
- Ciresi Conlin
- Clark Partington
- Douglas & London
- Dugan Law Firm
- Dunn Sheehan
- Fishman Haygood
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Harding Mazzotti
- Kellogg Hansen
- Laminack Pirtle
- Levin Papantonio
- Lieff Cabraser
- Monsour Law Firm
- Motley Rice
- OnderLaw
- Panish Shea
- Pittman Dutton
- Pope McGlamry
- Rafferty Domnick
- Robert Peirce & Associates
- Robins Kaplan
- Robinson Calcagnie
- Schwaba Law Firm
- Seeger Devine
- Seeger Weiss
- Simmons Hanly
- Singleton Schreiber
- Stag Liuzza
- Stranch Jennings
- Wagstaff & Cartmell
- Weisman Kennedy
- Weitz & Luxenberg
- Williams & Connolly
- Wright & Schulte
-
February 07, 2025
70 Depo-Provera Suits Joined In Florida's Northern District
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Friday consolidated more than 70 consumer lawsuits claiming that Pfizer Inc. failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about the risk of brain tumors associated with the hormonal contraceptive drug Depo-Provera in the Northern District of Florida.
-
January 30, 2025
Plaintiffs, Pfizer Spar Over Where To Join Depo-Provera Suits
Consumers who claim Pfizer Inc. failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about the risk of brain tumors associated with the hormonal contraceptive drug Depo-Provera urged the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Thursday to consolidate their cases but sparred over whether to move them to California or New York.