Okello T. Chatrie, Petitioner v. United States
Case Number:
25-112
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Consovoy McCarthy
- Jenner & Block
- Lehotsky Keller
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Williams & Connolly
- Willkie Farr
- WilmerHale
Companies
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Americans for Prosperity Foundation
- Cato Institute
- Center for Democracy & Technology
- Google LLC
- Institute for Justice
- Microsoft Corp.
- New Civil Liberties Alliance
- The Software & Information Industry Association
- X Corp.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 24, 2026
Up Last At High Court: TPS, Geofence, Skinny Labels
The U.S. Supreme Court will close out its oral argument portion of the 2025 October term by hearing a panoply of disputes over the constitutionality of geofence warrants, the existence of aiding and abetting torture claims, and the rescission of temporary protected status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants.
-
February 27, 2026
Geofence Warrants Harm 'Privacies Of Life,' Amici Tell Justices
Geofence warrants violate Fourth Amendment protections against government surveillance by being imprecise and overbroad in the information they obtain, civil rights and public interest groups argued Friday, urging the U.S. Supreme Court to prevent the warrants' use.
-
January 16, 2026
Justices Will Decide Constitutionality Of Geofence Warrants
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to review the constitutionality of geofence warrants, used by law enforcement to pinpoint suspects' whereabouts using location data handed over by technology firms like Google.
-
August 04, 2025
Circuit Split On Geofence Warrants 'Intolerable,' Justices Told
A Fourth Circuit panel skirted the issue when it was deciding the appeal of a man who was convicted on robbery charges using a geofence warrant to pinpoint his location, but now that man wants the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether such warrants are constitutional.