( May 13, 2025, 2:23 PM EDT) -- ST. PAUL, Minn. — Applying for the first time a framework set forth by the Minnesota Supreme Court for assessing the reasonableness and allocation of unallocated Miller-Shugart agreements, the Minnesota Court of Appeals on May 12 affirmed a trial court’s ruling that an unallocated $2 million settlement between a marina and a contractor over construction defect claims was reasonable and the court’s finding that the contractor’s insurer must pay $174,350 of that amount....