Brooks et al v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC et al

  1. August 08, 2025

    Greystar Can't Duck Tenants' Trimmed Security Deposit Suit

    A California federal judge has denied Greystar's request to dismiss a proposed class action alleging the property owner and manager unlawfully withheld tenants' security deposits, finding that the suit need not have named the special purpose entities that own the properties as defendants.

  2. July 22, 2024

    Greystar Can Arbitrate Security Deposit Claims, Judge Says

    A California federal judge ruled that Greystar can arbitrate the claims of a named plaintiff in a putative class action that accuses the real estate company of wrongfully withholding its former tenants' security deposits.

  3. December 21, 2023

    Security Deposit Suit Ill-Fitted For Class Action, Greystar Says

    Greystar Real Estate Partners continued to push its argument that a suit alleging it withheld security deposits without explanation is inappropriate for class action treatment, telling a California federal court that the claims should be thrown out or cut down.

  4. December 14, 2023

    Greystar Tenants Urge Judge To Keep Deposit Suit Alive

    Tenants accusing Greystar Real Estate Partners of keeping security deposits without explanation have urged a California federal judge to reject a move by the rental giant to escape their purported class action, accusing defense counsel of "disparaging" their attorneys.

  5. November 27, 2023

    Greystar Seeks Quick End To Security Deposits Suit

    Multifamily giant Greystar Real Estate Partners told a California federal judge it wants a proposed class action tossed that alleges it withheld tenants' security deposits without explanation, saying the court should take notice of similar cases, including one in which a judge denied certification of a class.

  6. September 20, 2023

    Greystar Faces Calif. Suit Over Security Deposit Charges

    Multifamily developer Greystar was hit with a class action for allegedly failing to explain why it withheld funds from former tenants' security deposits, despite a California law that requires landlords to disclose that information.