Kulwicki v. Aetna, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:22-cv-00229

Court:

Connecticut

Nature of Suit:

Civil Rights: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Vernon D. Oliver

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. September 25, 2025

    Aetna Can't Rein In LGBTQ+ Bias Suit Over Fertility Coverage

    Aetna can't narrow a proposed class action alleging it unlawfully required nonheterosexual patients to spend thousands of dollars before covering fertility treatments, as a Connecticut federal judge said the insurer failed to fully acknowledge its role in creating the health plan in question.

  2. March 13, 2024

    Aetna Can't Avoid Bias Suit Over Fertility Treatment Policy

    Aetna must face a proposed class action alleging it readily covers fertility treatments for infertile heterosexual women but forces non-heterosexual women to spend thousands out of pocket before paying for their treatments, with a Connecticut federal judge saying it doesn't matter if the insurer didn't control the health plan's terms.

  3. February 09, 2022

    Suit Says Aetna's Fertility Treatment Policy Is Discriminatory

    A woman hit Aetna with a putative class action in Connecticut federal court Wednesday, alleging the insurer discriminates by forcing non-heterosexual patients to pay out-of-pocket for fertility treatments while not forcing heterosexual women to do so because it labels them "infertile" if they can't conceive naturally.