Bryant v. Domino's Pizza Inc et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:22-cv-11319

See also:

Court:

Michigan Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Fair Standards

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Laurie J. Michelson

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. April 16, 2024

    Arbitration Pacts Leave Domino's Wage Suit Plaintiff-Less

    An expense reimbursement dispute against Domino's can't go forward because it will be without a named plaintiff, as the four drivers who were supposed to step in are all bound by arbitration agreements, a Michigan federal judge ruled Tuesday.

  2. January 25, 2024

    Domino's Seeks To Cut Swapped Plaintiffs In Driver Wage Row

    Domino's Pizza told a Michigan federal judge that none of the proposed substitute lead plaintiffs in an expense reimbursement collective action can adequately represent a nationwide class of delivery drivers because many of them have already committed to arbitrate their claims.

  3. September 25, 2023

    Named Plaintiff Drops Out Of Domino's Driver Wage Dispute

    A worker who filed a proposed collective action against Domino's Pizza agreed to arbitrate and dismiss her individual claims that workers were not reimbursed for work-related expenses, leading a Michigan federal judge on Monday to order the parties to find a new representative or risk the entire case's dismissal.

  4. August 24, 2023

    Domino's Can't Arbitrate Wage Suit Pending Discovery

    Domino's can't compel arbitration of a driver's wage suit because more discovery is needed as to whether the worker had full access to an arbitration pact and what the results are of opting out of it, a Michigan federal judge ruled Thursday.