AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al v. Tanase

Track this case

Case Number:

3:23-cv-00448

Court:

Virginia Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Judge:

Henry E. Hudson

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. April 17, 2025

    Judge Grants Reduced Atty Award in Bowling Alley Chain Suit

    A Virginia federal judge trimmed just over $150,000 in attorney fees requested by a bowling alley chain after winning summary judgment in a suit against its former chief information officer, whom it accused of hacking into its computer system and CEO's email.

  2. December 13, 2024

    Virginia Judge Will Rethink Atty Award Amount In Bowling Suit

    A Virginia federal judge has agreed to reconsider a requested $3.2 million attorney fee award to a bowling alley chain in its suit claiming that the company's former chief information officer hacked into its CEO's email, finding that a state law doesn't explicitly permit attorney fees.

  3. August 05, 2024

    Former Bowling Exec Asks For Denial Of Attorney Fee Award

    A former bowling company executive who last month ridiculed the size of the requested attorney fee award in a suit by his ex-employer told a Virginia federal judge this weekend that he should not have to pay the fees at all.

  4. July 15, 2024

    Former Exec Slams Bowling Co.'s 'Elitist' $3.7M Atty Fee Bid

    The owners of the AMF and Lucky Strike bowling chains are not entitled to more than $3 million in attorney fees after winning a lawsuit, the target of the suit told a Virginia federal court while characterizing the owners as "bullies." 

  5. July 03, 2024

    Bowling Co. Seeks $3.6M In Atty Fees From Former Exec

    One of the world's largest bowling operations asked a Virginia federal judge to award $3.6 million in legal fees stemming from a lawsuit that accuses the company's former chief information officer of repeatedly hacking into its CEO's email.