UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- McCune Law
- Patterson Belknap
- Ropes & Gray
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- MoloLamken
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Skadden Arps
- Baker Botts
- Zelle LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- WalterKipling
- Capes Sokol
- Bondurant Mixson
- Cozmyk Law Offices
- Wilson Sonsini
- Clifford Chance
- King & Spalding
- Gibson Dunn
- Davis Polk
- Holland & Knight
- Troutman
- Venable LLP
- LeGrand Law
- Munger Tolles
- Williams & Connolly
- Cohen & Gresser
- Morrison & Foerster
- Weil Gotshal
- Greenstein DeLorme
- Hueston Hennigan
- Riker Danzig
- Shook Hardy
- Freshfields
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Alioto Law Firm
- Lichten & Liss Riordan
- Larson LLP
- Cravath Swaine
- Aegis Law Group
- Kellogg Hansen
- Baker McKenzie
- Dechert LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Crowell & Moring
- Brownstein Hyatt
- Orrick Herrington
- Latham & Watkins
- Milbank LLP
- White & Case
Companies
- Group M Worldwide LLC
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- News Corp.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Anthropic PBC
- The Home Depot Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Digital Content Next
- Mozilla Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Google LLC
- American Economic Liberties Project
- NBCUniversal Media LLC
- adMarketplace Inc.
- DuckDuckGo Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- EE Ltd.
- ACT Corp
- Booking Holdings Inc.
- Yelp Inc.
- Computer & Communications Industry Association
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- AT&T Inc.
- Chamber of Progress
- Sonos Inc.
- Oracle Corp.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Yahoo Inc.
- ACT The App Association
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Comcast Corp.
Government Agencies
- State of Maryland
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Michigan
- State of Indiana
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Tennessee
- State of Nevada
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Federal Trade Commission
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 20, 2022
Google IDs 0 Cases Backing Sanctions Power; DOJ Finds 15
The Justice Department and Google provided dramatically different responses to a D.C. federal judge's request for examples of court sanctions that could help determine whether the company can be punished for allegedly training employees to hide evidence of supposed monopolistic practices behind privilege claims.
-
April 12, 2022
Google, DOJ Asked To Submit More Info In Privilege Row
A D.C. federal judge reiterated Tuesday that he is skeptical he can sanction Google based on U.S. Department of Justice allegations that the search giant trained employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged, but asked the parties to submit more information.
-
April 08, 2022
Google's 'Privilege' Labeling Unlikely To Yield Sanctions
A D.C. federal judge indicated Friday he's unlikely to sanction Google based on U.S. Department of Justice allegations that the search giant trained employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged, asserting during a hearing that there's no precedent for punishing pre-litigation conduct.
-
April 07, 2022
DOJ Says Google's 8,000 New Releases Show Privilege Abuse
In the week after the U.S. Department of Justice accused Google of training employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged, the search giant released more than 8,000 documents it previously wrongly withheld, the agency said in a brief supporting its sanction bid.
-
March 24, 2022
Google Says Attys CC'd Under Legit Rules, Not Fake Privilege
Google told a D.C. federal judge Thursday there was nothing nefarious about company training instructing employees to copy attorneys on certain communications and marking them as privileged, assailing a U.S. Department of Justice sanctions bid accusing the search giant of trying to "hide potential evidence" with false privilege labels.
-
March 21, 2022
DOJ Says Google Abusing Attorney-Client Privilege Claims
The U.S. Department of Justice wants Google sanctioned in the search advertising monopolization case over allegations that the company trains employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged.
-
March 09, 2022
DOJ, Google Continue Tussling Over Discovery
The U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion for sanctions against Google Inc. ahead of a conference in D.C. federal court Wednesday over discovery disputes in the government's search advertising monopolization case.
-
February 22, 2022
Google Antitrust Judge OKs DOJ's 'Likely' Witness List
A D.C. federal judge agreed with the Justice Department and state attorneys general Monday in a dispute with Google over the language that should be used for lists of potential witnesses in a landmark antitrust suit against the technology giant and capped potential third-party witnesses at 40 per side.
-
February 18, 2022
DOJ, Google Still Can't Agree Over 'Likely' Witness Lists
State and federal antitrust enforcers and Google told a D.C. federal judge Thursday they are close to finalizing their lists of potential witnesses to call in a case accusing the technology giant of monopolizing search and search advertising, but that the parties still disagree about wording.
-
February 11, 2022
Google Calls 300 Potential DOJ, AG Witnesses A 'Fake List'
State and federal antitrust enforcers may have to winnow down their lists of potential witnesses to call in a case accusing Google of monopolizing search and search advertising after the technology giant complained to a D.C. federal judge Friday of an overwhelming initial tally from the government.