October 20, 2020
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- McCune Law
- Patterson Belknap
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- MoloLamken
- Baker Botts
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Ropes & Gray
- Zelle LLP
- Foley & Lardner
- WalterKipling
- Capes Sokol
- Bondurant Mixson
- Cozmyk Law Offices
- Wilson Sonsini
- Clifford Chance
- King & Spalding
- Gibson Dunn
- Davis Polk
- Skadden Arps
- Holland & Knight
- Troutman
- Venable LLP
- LeGrand Law
- Munger Tolles
- Williams & Connolly
- Cohen & Gresser
- Morrison & Foerster
- Weil Gotshal
- Greenstein DeLorme
- Hueston Hennigan
- Riker Danzig
- Shook Hardy
- Freshfields
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Alioto Law Firm
- Lichten & Liss Riordan
- Larson LLP
- Cravath Swaine
- Aegis Law Group
- Kellogg Hansen
- Baker McKenzie
- Dechert LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Crowell & Moring
- Brownstein Hyatt
- Orrick Herrington
- Latham & Watkins
- Milbank LLP
- White & Case
Companies
- Group M Worldwide LLC
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- News Corp.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Anthropic PBC
- The Home Depot Inc.
- Apple Inc.
- Digital Content Next
- Mozilla Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Google LLC
- American Economic Liberties Project
- NBCUniversal Media LLC
- adMarketplace Inc.
- DuckDuckGo Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- EE Ltd.
- ACT Corp
- Booking Holdings Inc.
- Yelp Inc.
- Computer & Communications Industry Association
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- AT&T Inc.
- Chamber of Progress
- Sonos Inc.
- Oracle Corp.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Yahoo Inc.
- ACT The App Association
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Comcast Corp.
Government Agencies
- State of Maryland
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Indiana
- State of Michigan
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Tennessee
- State of Nevada
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Federal Trade Commission
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 04, 2025
Google Says Term Limits Only Needed For Some Search Fixes
Google told the D.C. federal court overseeing the government search monopolization case that there is no need to put a one-year term limit on its default search agreements with Android device manufacturers and wireless carriers because they are not exclusive.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login