Admiral Insurance Company v. Versailles Medical Spa, LLC et al
Case Number:
3:20-cv-00568
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
January 13, 2023
Insurer, Spa Settle Over Botched Skin Treatment Coverage
An insurer and a medical spa settled their coverage fight over an underlying suit accusing the spa of a botched skin treatment, they told a Connecticut federal court.
-
October 27, 2022
Insurer Told It Didn't Act In Bad Faith In Injury Dispute
An insurer for a medical spa gained a win when a Connecticut federal court found that the insurer didn't act in bad faith with its handling of an underlying suit accusing the spa of a botched skin treatment.
-
May 20, 2022
Medical Spa Slams Insurer's Bid To Nix Counterclaims
A medical spa involved in an underlying suit brought by a client over a botched skin treatment asked a Connecticut federal court to reject an insurer's attempt to toss its counterclaims for bad faith, saying the insurer distorted the facts of the disputed treatment and the insurance policy.
-
May 11, 2022
Insurer Says Jury Should Mull Testimony Changes In Spa Suit
Admiral Insurance Co. urged a Connecticut federal court not to hand a spa an early win in a coverage dispute over claims that a client suffered burns and permanent scarring on her legs, arguing that the client's change in testimony presents a factual dispute that a jury ought to consider.
-
April 20, 2022
Medical Spa Wants Quick Win Against Insurer In Injury Dispute
On Tuesday, a medical spa asked a Connecticut federal judge to grant it an early win in its coverage dispute with Admiral Insurance Co., arguing it was not required to disclose a customer complaint in its application for renewal of coverage because it was not a malpractice claim.
-
September 23, 2021
No Quick Win For Insurer In Medical Spa Injury Dispute
A Connecticut federal judge has rejected Admiral Insurance Co.'s request for a quick win in a coverage dispute with a medical spa, saying the insurer failed to establish what constitutes a claim in the policy language.