July 14, 2014

Darryl Pierce, et al v. Visteon Corporation, et al

Track this case

Case Number:

14-2542

Court:

Appellate - 7th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

3791 Employee Retirement

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. July 23, 2015

    Class Counsel Defends Fee Request In Visteon ERISA Action

    An Indianapolis attorney representing a class in employment litigation against auto parts supplier Visteon Corp. told a panel of Seventh Circuit judges Wednesday that they misunderstood his intentions when they penned a searing opinion chastising him for attempting to double dip attorneys' fees from his clients and Visteon.

4 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login